From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3510C433DB for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A327564E40 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232422AbhBBUVh (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:21:37 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55922 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232292AbhBBUTX (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:19:23 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537989DA3A; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:18:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=t7/4VUi81uqDxW0rgLQXxOD2ZLs=; b=Vzqkt6 T/fMzZ/w6CR/Ppn7N0xeO34xpaTjZDygHnPYCVm+6vV4/g3AXtZSV6THMbh5fdKH +upCIqfgd07D7qhCt8p3742xZp91M0mGtJ9ZvIkDe0KHXzSIg2u9YQNThEJSPYFS JCyYTeCfnZZ2ukeCbkDq+07KWYLuJ9cEkn1SI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OiwGqfAi/GwE4PAbjrVfn4hEl2oXrzyK saxhwGQa3RP3Pkp2McpIdB3NrfAUPTSnLtdqdWN9GLqd0eEUaqmJ3RZAFavFUcHp um9thIkdsUDd15G7/EXnwAsZLk2OZ7OZwlNs91BzMVPVD4v1NjdDZaMqk0RClnkI /92DWL5vMRA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2539DA37; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:18:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5BD49DA36; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:18:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2021, #06; Sat, 30) References: <87lfc8ocmt.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 12:18:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:54:56 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D6803D12-6593-11EB-BCDF-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > I'll give you a reason. We're not really strong on the inclusion front, > and translations are one thing that we actually do right on that end. > Removing even the scant testing of translated messages that we do have > strikes me as the opposite of improving the situation. If you are adding something that helps to encourage translation, that is totally a different story, and I thought that perhaps the rot13 stuff would be a good starting point for that. But I do not think keeping the fixed "### GETTEXT POISIN ###" would contribute to that very much. Keeping a "framework" that does not help to encourage translation and pretending that we have something, and complaining about its removal, is the opposite of helping wider translation.