From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8748BC388F9 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 19:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392F4221F1 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 19:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="kHwxIsz6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728440AbgKUThx (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:37:53 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:53474 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728403AbgKUThw (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:37:52 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B210CF848C; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:37:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=7ceeqNsRSrDs Ey3cpJtn0hteJDo=; b=kHwxIsz6s/m4mjlTnckGkZSKxN4ysEHgADtv8JJJHtit SheiI7jz4ej2wMYsOoBXJQ7v7VT6Ja4Pyby/7lMb7+FevUPZLYWLhLio+KLSbcxy u+9xq7ZqApaS7ctJQY7jquSRwfV3wQm2sEp72xUS/uRLN/SuGN1OHRplC6lQhBI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=pH3Rhw Pb0H+N4Bv2K5jzeTENBWF9UPaBYrw1m7NuDaOQssZJGuokjMCcqIWwZKz9hx8zwm AvfIofg8pfpTwUKDyWdKsrTXReNDs+oHPb4Et5nSVcknaqGDcrJ+YF159EiJ2ZNW hji+/lQ5fEb7+R3uVsVxLx4gY85sj0uGHS3cs= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA10DF848B; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:37:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE120F8488; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:37:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren?= Cc: Taylor Blau , Git Mailing List , Derrick Stolee , Jeff King , SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] pack-bitmap: bitmap generation improvements References: Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 11:37:45 -0800 In-Reply-To: ("Martin =?utf-8?Q?=C3=85gren=22's?= message of "Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:34:35 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 08F03820-2C31-11EB-AB26-E43E2BB96649-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Martin =C3=85gren writes: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 22:46, Taylor Blau wrote: >> Not very much has changed since last time, but a range-diff is below >> nonetheless. The major changes are: >> >> - Avoid an overflow when bounds checking in the second and third >> patches (thanks, Martin, for noticing). > > FWIW, the updates to patches 2 and 3 look exactly like what I was > expecting after the discussion on v1. I have nothing to add. Thanks, both. Shall we move the topic down to 'next'?