git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with ra/rebase-i-more-options - should we revert it?
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:11:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy2ubjkeo.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq5zhgkwxx.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 12 Jan 2020 16:43:38 -0800")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> I will push out what I wish to be able to tag as the final [*1*]
> shortly but without actually tagging, so that it can get a bit wider
> exposure than just the usual "Gitster tested locally and then did
> let Travis try them" testing.

I haven't heard from any failure report so (taking no news as good
news) I'll cut the final today based on what is already on the
public repositories everywhere.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-13 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-12 16:12 Problems with ra/rebase-i-more-options - should we revert it? Phillip Wood
2020-01-12 17:31 ` Phillip Wood
2020-01-12 18:41   ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-17 14:11     ` Phillip Wood
2020-01-20 11:15       ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-12 21:12   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-13  0:43     ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-13 18:11       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2020-01-13 22:03         ` "rebase -ri" (was Re: Problems with ra/rebase-i-more-options - should we revert it?) Junio C Hamano
2020-01-15 14:03           ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-15 18:14             ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-15 21:23               ` Rebasing evil merges with --rebase-merges Igor Djordjevic
2020-01-16  7:42                 ` Sergey Organov
2020-01-15 22:53               ` "rebase -ri" (was Re: Problems with ra/rebase-i-more-options - should we revert it?) Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqy2ubjkeo.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).