historical-speck.lore.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: speck@linutronix.de
Subject: [MODERATED] [PATCH 1/4] walnut 1
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:58:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190219155859.660790971@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190219155807.878855982@infradead.org

The cpuc data structure allocation is different between fake and real
cpuc's; use the same code to init/free both.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       |   13 +++++--------
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c |   29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |   11 ++++++++---
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -1995,7 +1995,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_commit_txn(struct pmu
  */
 static void free_fake_cpuc(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 {
-	kfree(cpuc->shared_regs);
+	intel_cpuc_finish(cpuc);
 	kfree(cpuc);
 }
 
@@ -2007,14 +2007,11 @@ static struct cpu_hw_events *allocate_fa
 	cpuc = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpuc), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!cpuc)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
-	/* only needed, if we have extra_regs */
-	if (x86_pmu.extra_regs) {
-		cpuc->shared_regs = allocate_shared_regs(cpu);
-		if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
-			goto error;
-	}
 	cpuc->is_fake = 1;
+
+	if (intel_cpuc_prepare(cpuc, cpu))
+		goto error;
+
 	return cpuc;
 error:
 	free_fake_cpuc(cpuc);
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3410,7 +3410,7 @@ ssize_t intel_event_sysfs_show(char *pag
 	return x86_event_sysfs_show(page, config, event);
 }
 
-struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
+static struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
 {
 	struct intel_shared_regs *regs;
 	int i;
@@ -3442,10 +3442,9 @@ static struct intel_excl_cntrs *allocate
 	return c;
 }
 
-static int intel_pmu_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
-{
-	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
 
+int intel_cpuc_prepare(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int cpu)
+{
 	if (x86_pmu.extra_regs || x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map) {
 		cpuc->shared_regs = allocate_shared_regs(cpu);
 		if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
@@ -3455,7 +3454,7 @@ static int intel_pmu_cpu_prepare(int cpu
 	if (x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_EXCL_CNTRS) {
 		size_t sz = X86_PMC_IDX_MAX * sizeof(struct event_constraint);
 
-		cpuc->constraint_list = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL);
+		cpuc->constraint_list = kzalloc_node(sz, GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
 		if (!cpuc->constraint_list)
 			goto err_shared_regs;
 
@@ -3480,6 +3479,11 @@ static int intel_pmu_cpu_prepare(int cpu
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
+static int intel_pmu_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
+{
+	return intel_cpuc_prepare(&per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu), cpu);
+}
+
 static void flip_smm_bit(void *data)
 {
 	unsigned long set = *(unsigned long *)data;
@@ -3554,9 +3558,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int c
 	}
 }
 
-static void free_excl_cntrs(int cpu)
+static void free_excl_cntrs(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 {
-	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
 	struct intel_excl_cntrs *c;
 
 	c = cpuc->excl_cntrs;
@@ -3577,9 +3580,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_dying(int cpu)
 		disable_counter_freeze();
 }
 
-static void intel_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
+void intel_cpuc_finish(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 {
-	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
 	struct intel_shared_regs *pc;
 
 	pc = cpuc->shared_regs;
@@ -3589,7 +3591,12 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
 		cpuc->shared_regs = NULL;
 	}
 
-	free_excl_cntrs(cpu);
+	free_excl_cntrs(cpuc);
+}
+
+static void intel_pmu_cpu_dead(int cpu)
+{
+	intel_cpuc_finish(&per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu));
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
@@ -4758,7 +4765,7 @@ static __init int fixup_ht_bug(void)
 	hardlockup_detector_perf_restart();
 
 	for_each_online_cpu(c)
-		free_excl_cntrs(c);
+		free_excl_cntrs(&per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, c));
 
 	cpus_read_unlock();
 	pr_info("PMU erratum BJ122, BV98, HSD29 workaround disabled, HT off\n");
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ struct event_constraint *
 x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int idx,
 			  struct perf_event *event);
 
-struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu);
+extern int intel_cpuc_prepare(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, int cpu);
+extern void intel_cpuc_finish(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc);
 
 int intel_pmu_init(void);
 
@@ -1026,9 +1027,13 @@ static inline int intel_pmu_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline struct intel_shared_regs *allocate_shared_regs(int cpu)
+static inline int intel_cpuc_prepare(struct cpu_hw_event *cpuc, int cpu)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void intel_cpuc_finish(struct cpu_hw_event *cpuc)
 {
-	return NULL;
 }
 
 static inline int is_ht_workaround_enabled(void)

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-19 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-19 15:58 [MODERATED] [PATCH 0/4] walnut 0 Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-19 15:58 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-02-19 15:58 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 2/4] walnut 2 Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-19 15:58 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 3/4] walnut 3 Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-19 15:58 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH 4/4] walnut 4 Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-19 16:10   ` [MODERATED] " Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20 22:31     ` Nelson D'Souza
2019-02-22 22:58       ` [MODERATED] Fwd: " Nelson D'Souza
2019-02-22 23:19         ` Nelson D'Souza
2019-02-19 18:49   ` [MODERATED] Linus Torvalds
2019-02-20 14:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-07 13:56   ` [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 4/4] walnut 4 Greg KH
2019-03-07 14:34     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-07 15:09     ` mark gross
2019-02-20 18:10 ` [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 0/4] walnut 0 mark gross
2019-02-22 19:20   ` Nelson D'Souza
2019-03-01 18:59 ` mark gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190219155859.660790971@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=speck@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).