From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 21 Oct 2019 12:54:38 -0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx1.suse.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iMXCl-0001K0-Re for speck@linutronix.de; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:54:37 +0200 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EE0AC35 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 14:54:29 +0200 From: Michal Hocko Subject: [MODERATED] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] TAAv5 8 Message-ID: <20191021125429.GP9379@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20191014210458.GF4957@zn.tnic> <20191015103454.GW317@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191016075434.GL317@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191016092333.GQ317@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191018001407.GA28905@guptapadev.amr> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191018001407.GA28905@guptapadev.amr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Thu 17-10-19 17:14:07, speck for Pawan Gupta wrote: [...] > Let me know if there are any questions. is there any list of CPUs that would benefit from tsx=auto compared to tsx=on? In other words do we really need both? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs