From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 20 Nov 2019 17:02:30 -0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iXTN6-0003aT-Hb for speck@linutronix.de; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:02:29 +0100 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:02:19 +0100 From: Greg KH Subject: [MODERATED] Re: LVI Message-ID: <20191120170219.GA3066100@kroah.com> References: <20191119174008.7dbymix2eo4mrv57@treble> <59d8550a-a217-7d30-9b44-e6a31cb4addf@citrix.com> <20191119182709.a3hu63nrnbffiped@treble> <20191119183646.GA19004@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191119183646.GA19004@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 10:36:46AM -0800, speck for Luck, Tony wrote: > Spoiler for tomorrow's industry meeting - I'm going to ask for > folks to send us all the "promises" that we've made about architecture > through random e-mails and conversations on Keybase. Goal is to > get the SDM updated with this information so we don't have to rely > on people's recollection of these informal disclosures. I don't want to sound snarky, but wtf? Don't you all have this all documented/written down somewhere already that you used to tell us this in the first place? Shouldn't you all be documenting what does, and does not, happen with regards to flushing buffers and the like for different situations so that you all know how to test and verify that we actually are fixing all of this with the different OS releases? thanks, greg k-h