From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 25 Feb 2020 01:26:55 -0000 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1j6Ozt-0002Nh-Jz for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:26:54 +0100 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA6561257 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 01:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from treble (ovpn-124-129.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.124.129]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD2C5C105 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 01:26:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:26:41 -0600 From: Josh Poimboeuf Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 2/2] more sampling fun 2 Message-ID: <20200225012641.slc34bromzk3yj3l@treble> References: <20200224173121.GA32673@char.us.oracle.com> <20200224181734.GB29636@zn.tnic> <20200224213929.GA100552@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> <20200224231034.GE29636@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200224231034.GE29636@zn.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 12:10:34AM +0100, speck for Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:39:29PM -0800, speck for mark gross wrote: > > The implementation uses srbds_mitigation=.. (the commit comment now updated to > > reflect this) > > Certainly not with "mitigation" in the name. All those switches control > mitigations so there's no need to tautologically have it in the name > too. Why not just srbds= ? That's what Intel calls it, and it would be consistent with some of the other options like mds= and l1tf=. -- Josh