From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 27 Apr 2020 15:10:43 -0000 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jT5P7-0005wN-ON for speck@linutronix.de; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:10:42 +0200 Received: from localhost (mtg-dev.jf.intel.com [10.54.74.10]) by smtp.ostc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890136363 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:10:34 -0700 From: mark gross Subject: [MODERATED] Re: Slow Randomizing Boosts Denial of Service - Bulletin #1 Message-ID: <20200427151034.GA103862@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> Reply-To: mgross@linux.intel.com References: <20200416172021.rf4l55ci6leimccm@treble> <20200416174914.GH21456@zn.tnic> <20200420143046.GA23804@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> <87zhb5vnkt.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20200423213543.GA95955@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> <20200424070106.GA146266@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200424070106.GA146266@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:01:06AM +0200, speck for Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 02:35:43PM -0700, speck for mark gross wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:45:06PM +0200, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > I've merged the V8 series with the polishing done by Borislav into the > > > master branch (based on 5.7-rc2) of the speck git repository at: > > > > > > cvs.ou.linutronix.de:linux/speck/linux > > > > > > The commits are considered stable from now on. Any further tweaks need > > > to go on top. > > > > > > The stable branches linux-5.6.y, linux-5.4.y, linux-4.19.y and > > > linux-4.14.y have been updated with backports. Kernels prior to 4.14 are > > > left as an exercise to the members of the kernel necrophilia cult as > > > usual. > > > > We have ran all these through the test cases I used in my development. They all > > pass. > > > > FWIW I did backports from 4.14.y to 4.9 (easy) and 4.4 (needed to cherry pic an > > extra patch to make it work) These also pass testing. > > > > Should I post them to this list or sit on them until disclosure? > > Why wait? > > Please post them, I would greatly appreciate them. ok --mark