From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 07 Apr 2020 15:17:46 -0000 Received: from [5.158.153.52] (helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jLpyz-0007yO-9x for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 17:17:45 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] V5 more sampling fun 2 In-Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=3C64dda4916925a38de932137b0cc6ed301137d13f=2E15861?= =?utf-8?q?95554=2Egit=2Emgross=40linux=2Eintel=2Ecom=3E?= References: =?utf-8?q?=3C64dda?= =?utf-8?q?4916925a38de932137b0cc6ed301137d13f=2E1586195554=2Egit=2Emgro?= =?utf-8?q?ss=40linux=2Eintel=2Ecom=3E?= Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 17:17:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87imibjpev.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: Mark, speck for mark gross writes: > + > +static bool __init cpu_matches(unsigned long which, const struct x86_cpu_id *table) > { > - const struct x86_cpu_id *m = x86_match_cpu(cpu_vuln_whitelist); > + const struct x86_cpu_id *m = x86_match_cpu(table); Can this and the fixup of the caller please be in a separate patch? Thanks, tglx