From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 28 Apr 2020 22:25:23 -0000 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jTYfJ-00075M-G7 for speck@linutronix.de; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:25:22 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Slow Randomizing Boosts DoS v4.4.219 backport 0 In-Reply-To: <20200428213837.GB122693@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> References: <87mu6wpvnc.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <20200428143936.GA120520@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> <20200428152213.GA1565321@kroah.com> <20200428213837.GB122693@mtg-dev.jf.intel.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:25:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87r1w7nt80.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: speck for mark gross writes: >> Can you resend this series in a format I can use? > I will certainly try but, other than the smtp send failure dropping the one > patch and dropping the Conflicts list in the backport is there something else I > need to look out for? I "backported" the 4.9.y backport of Jia's patch I think > that may be one thing Thomas was calling out. Is that ok or should I redo that > backport using the original version it first landed in? It's all sorted and pushed out to the speck repo and the bundles are there as well. Nothing to do right now. Thanks, tglx