From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 01 Mar 2019 16:05:00 -0000 Received: from p5492e5b8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.146.229.184] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gzkeh-0007Dp-BY for speck@linutronix.de; Fri, 01 Mar 2019 17:04:59 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 17:04:58 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch V5 02/14] MDS basics 2 In-Reply-To: <20190228202335.mlgexqyyvgyhtn4f@treble> Message-ID: References: <20190227150939.605235753@linutronix.de> <20190227152037.187103797@linutronix.de> <20190228135542.warw34exflldkofr@treble> <20190228202335.mlgexqyyvgyhtn4f@treble> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: Josh, On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, speck for Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > Staring/drooling at the latest cpu_vuln_whitelist table in git, I think > I spotted a few differences: > > - INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_BONNELL_MID was removed (should be NO_SPECULATION). > > - I think INTEL_FAM6_CORE_YONAH had NO_L1TF added. > > If those were intentional (which I doubt) then they should go in > separate commits. Definitely not. Thanks for spotting. I'll go over them with a fine comb once again. Thanks, tglx