From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (193.142.43.55:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 29 Oct 2019 11:00:17 -0000 Received: from [89.225.235.242] (helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1iPPEW-0005hb-6l for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:00:16 +0100 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:00:10 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] NX 0 In-Reply-To: <20191029093900.GF838@suse.de> Message-ID: References: <1571902455-22638-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20191028160203.GB838@suse.de> <20191029093900.GF838@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Tue, 29 Oct 2019, speck for Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hey Thomas, > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:51:56AM +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Yes, but what's the final resolution of the 3/5 patch? > > Hmm, I didn't get a conflict when applying patch 3/5, was that on > master? Not a conflict, but 3/5 needs an extra delta patch on top AFAICT. Paolo said he would send a v8. I'll have a look later today. Thanks, tglx