From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wilson Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: don't grab dev->struct_mutex for userspace forcewak Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:22:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1344637338_72217@CP5-2952> References: <1344544438-5654-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fireflyinternet.com (smtp.fireflyinternet.com [109.228.6.236]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3405AA102A for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:22:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1344544438-5654-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Intel Graphics Development Cc: Daniel Vetter , Ben Widawsky List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:33:58 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Since forcewake is now protected by a spinlock, we don't need to grab > dev->struct_mutex any more. This way we can also get rid of a stale > comment, noticed by Ben Widawsky while reviewing some locking changes. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson (Although I still wish it were not so) -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre