From: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>
To: "Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath".
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 13:39:02 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158998194264.30692.12026683630512691160@emeril.freedesktop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200520130030.1014994-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath".
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/77472/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim sparse --fast origin/drm-tip
Sparse version: v0.6.0
Fast mode used, each commit won't be checked separately.
+drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_syncmap.c:80:54: warning: dubious: x | !y
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-20 13:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/23] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/23] drm/i915: Remove locking from i915_gem_object_prepare_read/write Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/23] drm/i915: Parse command buffer earlier in eb_relocate(slow) Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation" Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/23] drm/i915/gem: Make eb_add_lut interruptible wait on object lock Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/23] drm/i915: Use per object locking in execbuf, v10 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/23] drm/i915: Use ww locking in intel_renderstate Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/23] drm/i915: Add ww context handling to context_barrier_task Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/23] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Pin engine before pinning all objects, v4 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/23] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/23] drm/i915: Make sure execbuffer always passes ww state to i915_vma_pin Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/23] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/23] drm/i915: Kill last user of intel_context_create_request outside of selftests Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/23] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/23] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/23] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/23] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request() Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/23] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:00 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/23] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the pin mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2020-05-20 13:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath" Patchwork
2020-05-20 13:39 ` Patchwork [this message]
2020-05-20 14:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-05-25 14:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-05-28 19:44 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Drop relocation slowpath". (rev2) Patchwork
2020-05-28 19:45 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-05-28 20:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158998194264.30692.12026683630512691160@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--to=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).