From: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org> To: "Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 07:34:10 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <162737125053.18666.8866567914767316587@emeril.freedesktop.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210727071845.841554-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> == Series Details == Series: series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93056/ State : warning == Summary == $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip 84aa6c05f713 drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL 2237799b400a drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c 6011233fbc7e drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c 16b255a7143e drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c 015b23d3e34e drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c 40cbd5fc3c1d drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c ce0001293c11 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c e8d98b29fd9d drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c dc12f36ad994 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c 6e7cf4e004f5 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c 98fa787acbd9 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c 4f34aa14a702 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c 222000469bb1 drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c 8df58456158c drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables 506c792c86b3 drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c -:63: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'id' - possible side-effects? #63: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7752: +#define GLK_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A) + (set) * 8, \ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B) + (set) * 8) -:63: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'set' - possible side-effects? #63: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7752: +#define GLK_PS_COEF_INDEX_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2A) + (set) * 8, \ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_INDEX_2B) + (set) * 8) -:68: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'id' - possible side-effects? #68: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7756: +#define GLK_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A) + (set) * 8, \ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B) + (set) * 8) -:68: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'set' - possible side-effects? #68: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:7756: +#define GLK_PS_COEF_DATA_SET(pipe, id, set) _MMIO_PIPE(pipe, \ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1A, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2A) + (set) * 8, \ _ID(id, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_1B, _PS_COEF_SET0_DATA_2B) + (set) * 8) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 48 lines checked 68fcd2f1f506 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c 58364762cb69 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c 4541a36b1fa9 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c 708e28316b93 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c 87f4dc291f49 drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c 98f26f380fc4 drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c 765c88769c02 drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c e65974c74595 drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h 544b72f54be6 drm/i915: finish removal of CNL 0916dd775911 drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 -:348: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'dev_priv' - possible side-effects? #348: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:1652: +#define HAS_GMBUS_BURST_READ(dev_priv) (GRAPHICS_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || \ IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv) || \ IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 336 lines checked 3a0814c0a9f4 drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers 78303adaa154 drm/i915: replace random CNL comments f12c2ebdf907 drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 7:34 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-27 7:18 [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/28] " Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 02/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 03/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 04/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 05/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 06/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 07/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 08/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 09/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 10/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 11/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 12/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 13/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 14/28] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 15/28] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 16/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 17/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 18/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 19/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 20/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 21/28] drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 22/28] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 23/28] drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 24/28] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 25/28] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 26/28] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 27/28] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 28/28] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 16:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2.1] " Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:34 ` Patchwork [this message] 2021-07-27 7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Patchwork 2021-07-27 8:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-07-27 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork 2021-07-27 17:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL (rev2) Patchwork 2021-07-27 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-07-27 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-07-28 3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=162737125053.18666.8866567914767316587@emeril.freedesktop.org \ --to=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \ --subject='Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).