From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CDC4C4332F for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF15610E2AD; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11E3110E2AC; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:01:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1699264917; x=1730800917; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to; bh=6bHMkATEJ+mnbjtM+ryLL2gOSS19x5PGbIDvtB91e5E=; b=FZi/wVXswIXrM2FxIxCoKP+GQBU4jU7Aa7drdjrw+erA2ZzPFa2AJsUw g0JCeAUUx4R6s3EBZbgBd98gXJUlgwh4q91PHBZSe5gNhP3G3P0gIewE4 ERVgrK/WTzkbGThohVpzOfYCdItpZjeTEcCOKqG+PkdOS2bQru/WE7NNK vuFSuLIWE0Ab6XXTJvsa32F2zpi+9gLC5JTlApju+rHdzgHqpwAuIgmhL 4jZo25NGtaWpCtTEApsOjTHb94z54ijn8YzkS/bBm+6niausf8IJiBZIs 9r0BMkQu5j78z4gfDpl4bYxzCZ9PzVBIsNLNKpL7/b8FksEZ36DYu7vrr A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10885"; a="379634830" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,281,1694761200"; d="scan'208,217";a="379634830" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Nov 2023 02:01:56 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10885"; a="828166822" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,281,1694761200"; d="scan'208,217";a="828166822" Received: from lapeders-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.249.254.193]) ([10.249.254.193]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Nov 2023 02:01:53 -0800 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------0g10498400YEkOTckBcQl0xI" Message-ID: <1807db8f-2ba6-0838-1d4c-39ff4cb7a34d@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:01:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US To: David Edelsohn , Maarten Lankhorst , Daniel Vetter , Dave Airlie References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Hellstr=c3=b6m?= In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: dim-tools@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Rodrigo Vivi Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------0g10498400YEkOTckBcQl0xI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, David. On 11/3/23 17:37, David Edelsohn wrote: > Dual-license drm_gpuvm to GPL-2.0 OR MIT. > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c > index 02ce6baacdad..08c088319652 100644 --- > a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT > /* > * Copyright (c) 2022 Red Hat. > * > The above SPDX License Identifier change is incorrect and no longer > valid. The change misunderstood the syntax of SPDX license identifiers > and boolean operations. GPL-2.0-only is the name of the license and means > GPL 2.0 only, as opposed to GPL 2.0 or later. The "only" does not > refer to restrictions on other licenses in the identifier and should > not have been > removed. The hyphens designated that the name was a single unit. > The SPDX License Identifier boolean operators, such as OR, are a > separate layer > of syntax. > The SPDX License Identifier should be > GPL-2.0-only OR MIT > Thanks, David The author has acked the change / relicensing, which is also described in the commit title so could you please elaborate why you think it is not valid? Thanks, Thomas --------------0g10498400YEkOTckBcQl0xI Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, David.

On 11/3/23 17:37, David Edelsohn wrote= :
Dual-license drm_gpuvm to GPL-2.0 OR MIT.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c =
b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
index 02ce6baacdad..08c088319652 100644
--- a/drivers/g=
pu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/g=
pu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: G=
PL-2.0-only
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT
 /*
=
  * Copyright (c) 2022 Red Hat.
*
The above SPDX License Identifie= r change is incorrect and no longer
valid. The change misunderstood the syntax of SPDX license ide= ntifiers
and boolean opera= tions. GPL-2.0-only is the name of the license and means
<= font face=3D"arial, sans-serif">GPL 2.0 only, as opposed to GPL 2.0 or la= ter. The "only" does not
= refer to restrictions on other licenses in the identifier and should not = have been
removed. The hy= phens designated that the name was a single unit.
The SPDX License Identifier boolean operators, such a= s OR, are a separate layer
of syntax.
The SPDX License Identifi= er should be
GPL-2.0-only OR MIT
Thanks, David

The author has acked the change / relicensing, which is also described in the commit title so could you please elaborate why you think it is not valid?

Thanks,

Thomas



--------------0g10498400YEkOTckBcQl0xI--