From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Niehusmann Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc8 regressions Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:19:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20110316211933.GA8316@x61s.reliablesolutions.de> References: <20110314090811.GA4779@x61s.reliablesolutions.de> <20110316174654.GA24936@jannic.reliablesolutions.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.moria.gondor.com (vs1.gondor.com [78.47.100.202]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D80E9E818 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chris Wilson Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 06:34:57PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:46:55 +0100, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > > With that patch applied, I still observed the described behaviour. > > Additionally, some java application had display update problems. (But > > java generally has some problems because I'm using a non-reparenting > > window manager, 'awesome', which java doesn't like). > > > > What do you think, would it be worthwhile to try a more recent version > > of xf86-video-intel? > > Ok, that's more worrying. That bug certainly matched what you describe, > and I don't offhand know of another commit since 2.13 that is relevant. It > would be good to double-check first though. Same with 2.14.901 from debian/experimental. Jan