From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: read/write IOCTLs
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:35:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110404013504.GA25417@snipes.kumite> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7da2f$qure4k@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com>
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 07:46:31AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> What I guess I was trying to express was that we need to be very clear
> what the interface is for and the limitations about its use.
>
> For the more complicated set of registers, we can and should expose knobs
> in the debugfs to read and write them. For instance, to control the render
> clock frequencies and thresholds.
>
> But perhaps we do need to reconsider the performance aspect. intel_gpu_top
> samples the ring HEAD and TAIL at around 10KHz and forcing gt-wake is
> about 50 microseconds... I hope I'm mistaken, because even batched that is
> doomed. Ben, do you mind checking that thought experiment with a little
> hard fact?
Here is the data from ~100 samples while playing playing Armacycles Advanced
measured off of d-i-f 7f58aabc369014fda3a4a33604ba0a1b63b941ac.
min 02.775us
max 19.402us
avg 07.057us
stddev 02.819us
When I do a cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_gem_interrupt, I always get
3 reads, in a similar pattern to this:
6) ! 285.852 us | __gen6_gt_force_wake_get();
6) 1.944 us | __gen6_gt_force_wake_get();
6) 1.854 us | __gen6_gt_force_wake_get();
Not sure why that case is so different.
> -Chris
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-04 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-01 1:31 [PATCH] drm/i915: read/write IOCTLs Ben Widawsky
2011-04-01 1:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Ben Widawsky
2011-04-01 23:54 ` Read/Write IOCTL compromise Ben Widawsky
2011-04-06 21:38 ` No more read/write ioctls Ben Widawsky
2011-04-08 17:10 ` Eric Anholt
2011-04-08 17:29 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-01 23:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/i915: read/write ioctls for userspace Ben Widawsky
2011-04-04 17:14 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-05 1:30 ` Read/Write ioctls Ben Widawsky
2011-04-05 1:30 ` [PATCH v4] drm/i915: read/write ioctls for userspace Ben Widawsky
2011-04-01 23:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/i915: debugfs for register write taint Ben Widawsky
2011-04-01 6:36 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: read/write IOCTLs Chris Wilson
2011-04-01 7:06 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-01 7:32 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-01 18:51 ` Eric Anholt
2011-04-02 6:46 ` Chris Wilson
2011-04-02 15:16 ` Ben Widawsky
2011-04-04 1:35 ` Ben Widawsky [this message]
2011-04-04 7:36 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110404013504.GA25417@snipes.kumite \
--to=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).