From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: properly cancel rps_work on
	module unload
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:27:18 -0700
Message-ID: <20110905102718.43b211e5@bwidawsk.net>
References: <20110904195731.GD2799@phenom.ffwll.local>
	<1315210528-10976-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from cloud01.chad-versace.us (184-106-247-128.static.cloud-ips.com
	[184.106.247.128])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCA69E935
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon,  5 Sep 2011 10:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1315210528-10976-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon,  5 Sep 2011 10:15:28 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> The rps disabling code wasn't properly cancelling outstanding work
> items. Also add a comment that explains why we're not racing with
> the work item that could unmask interrupts - that piece of code
> confused me quite a bit.
> 
> v2: Ben Widawsky pointed out that the first patch would deadlock
> (and a few lesser problems). All corrected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>

This looks good. I think we need to do something in i915_save_state()
too though.