From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Galibert Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] intel gen4-5: Fix backface/frontface selection when one one color is written to. Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 20:03:47 +0200 Message-ID: <20120720180346.GA90411@dspnet.fr> References: <1342728024-15055-1-git-send-email-galibert@pobox.com> <1342728024-15055-5-git-send-email-galibert@pobox.com> <87mx2utlio.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mx2utlio.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Eric Anholt Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:01:03AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > > diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > > index 3f98137..3b62952 100644 > > --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > > +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp > > @@ -972,6 +972,15 @@ fs_visitor::calculate_urb_setup() > > if (c->key.vp_outputs_written & BITFIELD64_BIT(i)) { > > int fp_index = _mesa_vert_result_to_frag_attrib((gl_vert_result) i); > > > > + /* Special case: two-sided vertex option, vertex program > > + * only writes to the back color. Map it to the > > + * associated front color location. > > + */ > > + if (i >= VERT_RESULT_BFC0 && i <= VERT_RESULT_BFC1 && > > + ctx->VertexProgram._TwoSideEnabled && > > + urb_setup[i - VERT_RESULT_BFC0 + FRAG_ATTRIB_COL0] == -1) > > + fp_index = i - VERT_RESULT_BFC0 + FRAG_ATTRIB_COL0; > > In the fs_visitor (and brw_wm_pass*), you don't get to look at ctx-> > state like that -- you're getting called once with some set of ctx > state, but the program will get reused even if the ctx state changes. > You'd have to get that state into the wm prog key, and use that, which > would guarantee that you have the appropriate program code. Ok. OTOH, we don't actually *need* to look at TwoSideEnabled. If the rest of the condition triggers it's either correct or undefined behaviour. So we can do it systematically. OG.