From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Widawsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: use mutex_lock_interruptible for debugfs files Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:18:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20120809131841.0b116f2e@bwidawsk.net> References: <1344504744_63017@CP5-2952> <1344517622-21888-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1344517622-21888-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shiva.chad-versace.us (209-20-75-48.static.cloud-ips.com [209.20.75.48]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDD99E758 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:18:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1344517622-21888-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Intel Graphics Development List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:07:02 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's no fun if your shell hangs when the driver has gone on vacation > and you want to know why ... > > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 31aa4b8..8acb8e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -794,10 +794,14 @@ i915_error_state_write(struct file *filp, > struct seq_file *m = filp->private_data; > struct i915_error_state_file_priv *error_priv = m->private; > struct drm_device *dev = error_priv->dev; > + int ret; > > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Resetting error state\n"); > > - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > i915_destroy_error_state(dev); > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); > > @@ -1467,8 +1471,12 @@ static int i915_swizzle_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data) > struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private; > struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev; > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > + int ret; > + > + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > seq_printf(m, "bit6 swizzle for X-tiling = %s\n", > swizzle_string(dev_priv->mm.bit_6_swizzle_x)); > seq_printf(m, "bit6 swizzle for Y-tiling = %s\n", > @@ -1669,7 +1677,7 @@ i915_ring_stop_write(struct file *filp, > struct drm_device *dev = filp->private_data; > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > char buf[20]; > - int val = 0; > + int val = 0, ret; > > if (cnt > 0) { > if (cnt > sizeof(buf) - 1) > @@ -1684,7 +1692,10 @@ i915_ring_stop_write(struct file *filp, > > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Stopping rings 0x%08x\n", val); > > - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > dev_priv->stop_rings = val; > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); > > @@ -1861,12 +1872,15 @@ i915_cache_sharing_read(struct file *filp, > drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > char buf[80]; > u32 snpcr; > - int len; > + int len, ret; > > if (!(IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev))) > return -ENODEV; > > - mutex_lock(&dev_priv->dev->struct_mutex); > + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > snpcr = I915_READ(GEN6_MBCUNIT_SNPCR); > mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->dev->struct_mutex); > > @@ -1976,6 +1990,7 @@ static int i915_forcewake_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > { > struct drm_device *dev = inode->i_private; > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > + int ret; > > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6) > return 0; > @@ -1987,7 +2002,10 @@ static int i915_forcewake_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) > * hanging here is probably a minor inconvenience not to be seen my > * almost every user. > */ > - mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv); > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); > If you feel like changing this intentionally non interruptible lock, you should kill the comment about it too. -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center