From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Damien Lespiau Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Resume dissecting intel_gtt Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:40:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20130129084006.GF6187@dyon.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1359042615-30362-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1359067500-4318-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> <1359067500-4318-6-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DDBE6749 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 00:40:16 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1359067500-4318-6-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: Daniel Vetter , Intel GFX List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:45:00PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote: > With the probe call in our dispatch table, we can now cut away two of > the remaining members in the intel_gtt shared struct. > > v2: Rebased on top of Daniel's series > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky Shouldn't the commit message be that you get rid of struct intel_gtt entirely? Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau -- Damien