From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Resume dissecting intel_gtt
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:02:02 -0800
Message-ID: <20130129190202.GC692@lundgren.nims.intel.com>
References: <1359042615-30362-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<1359067500-4318-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
	<1359067500-4318-6-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
	<20130129084006.GF6187@dyon.amr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from shiva.chad-versace.us (209-20-75-48.static.cloud-ips.com
	[209.20.75.48])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CB6E5E11
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:00:57 -0800 (PST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130129084006.GF6187@dyon.amr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Intel GFX <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:40:06AM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:45:00PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > With the probe call in our dispatch table, we can now cut away two of
> > the remaining members in the intel_gtt shared struct.
> > 
> > v2: Rebased on top of Daniel's series
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> 
> Shouldn't the commit message be that you get rid of struct intel_gtt
> entirely?

Yes, I corrected this info on IRC a few days ago. Daniel, please fix
that up if/when you take the patch.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
> 
> -- 
> Damien

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center