From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09147C352A3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DB62082F for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:16:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B9DB62082F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468E26EA29; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 169F96EA29 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:16:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2020 04:16:56 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,428,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="226488002" Received: from ideak-desk.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.183]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2020 04:16:55 -0800 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:16:32 +0200 From: Imre Deak To: Stanislav Lisovskiy Message-ID: <20200211121632.GA28263@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> References: <20200211114038.21035-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200211114038.21035-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1] drm/i915: Call intel_edp_init_connector only for eDP. X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: imre.deak@intel.com Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 01:40:38PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote: > I guess it would still be nice to make the code less confusing > and do not call eDP specific function, for non-eDP connectors > just to immediately return true(success) value as a hack. > > So simply extracted that check out from this function, > that we simply don't call it for non-eDP connectors. Bingo. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 13 ++++++------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > index f4dede6253f8..9bd36197a43d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c > @@ -7370,9 +7370,6 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, > intel_wakeref_t wakeref; > struct edid *edid; > > - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) > - return true; > - > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&intel_dp->panel_vdd_work, edp_panel_vdd_work); > > /* > @@ -7590,10 +7587,12 @@ intel_dp_init_connector(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port, > intel_dp_mst_encoder_init(intel_dig_port, > intel_connector->base.base.id); > > - if (!intel_edp_init_connector(intel_dp, intel_connector)) { > - intel_dp_aux_fini(intel_dp); > - intel_dp_mst_encoder_cleanup(intel_dig_port); > - goto fail; > + if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) { > + if (!intel_edp_init_connector(intel_dp, intel_connector)) { > + intel_dp_aux_fini(intel_dp); > + intel_dp_mst_encoder_cleanup(intel_dig_port); > + goto fail; > + } Yes, one jump less when reading the code. You could also use a&&b to reduce the indent: Reviewed-by: Imre Deak > } > > intel_dp_add_properties(intel_dp, connector); > -- > 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx