intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Store CS timestamp frequency in Hz
Date: Mon,  2 Mar 2020 16:39:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200302143943.32676-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302143943.32676-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

kHz isn't accurate enough for storing the CS timestamp
frequency on some of the platforms. Store the value
in Hz instead.

Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c        |  6 ++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c       |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c           | 12 ++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c   | 34 +++++++++++-----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h   |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c |  4 +--
 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 8f2525e4ce0f..c0e54c500017 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1790,8 +1790,8 @@ static int i915_engine_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	seq_printf(m, "GT awake? %s [%d]\n",
 		   yesno(dev_priv->gt.awake),
 		   atomic_read(&dev_priv->gt.wakeref.count));
-	seq_printf(m, "CS timestamp frequency: %u kHz\n",
-		   RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz);
+	seq_printf(m, "CS timestamp frequency: %u Hz\n",
+		   RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
 
 	p = drm_seq_file_printer(m);
 	for_each_uabi_engine(engine, dev_priv)
@@ -1890,7 +1890,7 @@ static int
 i915_perf_noa_delay_set(void *data, u64 val)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = data;
-	const u32 clk = RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz;
+	const u32 clk = RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz / 1000;
 
 	/*
 	 * This would lead to infinite waits as we're doing timestamp
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
index 54fce81d5724..d042644b9cd2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ int i915_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 			return -ENODEV;
 		break;
 	case I915_PARAM_CS_TIMESTAMP_FREQUENCY:
-		value = 1000 * RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz;
+		value = RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz;
 		break;
 	case I915_PARAM_MMAP_GTT_COHERENT:
 		value = INTEL_INFO(i915)->has_coherent_ggtt;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index 716fe6e4e56c..a2f98fb08bf1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -1668,8 +1668,8 @@ static int alloc_noa_wait(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
 	struct i915_vma *vma;
 	const u64 delay_ticks = 0xffffffffffffffff -
 		DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(atomic64_read(&stream->perf->noa_programming_delay) *
-				 RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz,
-				 1000000);
+				 RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz,
+				 1000000000);
 	const u32 base = stream->engine->mmio_base;
 #define CS_GPR(x) GEN8_RING_CS_GPR(base, x)
 	u32 *batch, *ts0, *cs, *jump;
@@ -3466,8 +3466,8 @@ i915_perf_open_ioctl_locked(struct i915_perf *perf,
 
 static u64 oa_exponent_to_ns(struct i915_perf *perf, int exponent)
 {
-	return div_u64(1000000 * (2ULL << exponent),
-		       RUNTIME_INFO(perf->i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz);
+	return div_u64(1000000000 * (2ULL << exponent),
+		       RUNTIME_INFO(perf->i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -4359,8 +4359,8 @@ void i915_perf_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	if (perf->ops.enable_metric_set) {
 		mutex_init(&perf->lock);
 
-		oa_sample_rate_hard_limit = 1000 *
-			(RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz / 2);
+		oa_sample_rate_hard_limit =
+			RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz / 2;
 
 		mutex_init(&perf->metrics_lock);
 		idr_init(&perf->metrics_idr);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index d7fe12734db8..32733535964d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -135,8 +135,8 @@ void intel_device_info_print_runtime(const struct intel_runtime_info *info,
 	sseu_dump(&info->sseu, p);
 
 	drm_printf(p, "rawclk rate: %u kHz\n", info->rawclk_freq);
-	drm_printf(p, "CS timestamp frequency: %u kHz\n",
-		   info->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz);
+	drm_printf(p, "CS timestamp frequency: %u Hz\n",
+		   info->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
 }
 
 static int sseu_eu_idx(const struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, int slice,
@@ -677,12 +677,12 @@ static u32 read_reference_ts_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 
 	base_freq = ((ts_override & GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DIVIDER_MASK) >>
 		     GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DIVIDER_SHIFT) + 1;
-	base_freq *= 1000;
+	base_freq *= 1000000;
 
 	frac_freq = ((ts_override &
 		      GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DENOMINATOR_MASK) >>
 		     GEN9_TIMESTAMP_OVERRIDE_US_COUNTER_DENOMINATOR_SHIFT);
-	frac_freq = 1000 / (frac_freq + 1);
+	frac_freq = 1000000 / (frac_freq + 1);
 
 	return base_freq + frac_freq;
 }
@@ -690,8 +690,8 @@ static u32 read_reference_ts_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 static u32 gen10_get_crystal_clock_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 					u32 rpm_config_reg)
 {
-	u32 f19_2_mhz = 19200;
-	u32 f24_mhz = 24000;
+	u32 f19_2_mhz = 19200000;
+	u32 f24_mhz = 24000000;
 	u32 crystal_clock = (rpm_config_reg &
 			     GEN9_RPM_CONFIG0_CRYSTAL_CLOCK_FREQ_MASK) >>
 			    GEN9_RPM_CONFIG0_CRYSTAL_CLOCK_FREQ_SHIFT;
@@ -710,10 +710,10 @@ static u32 gen10_get_crystal_clock_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 static u32 gen11_get_crystal_clock_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 					u32 rpm_config_reg)
 {
-	u32 f19_2_mhz = 19200;
-	u32 f24_mhz = 24000;
-	u32 f25_mhz = 25000;
-	u32 f38_4_mhz = 38400;
+	u32 f19_2_mhz = 19200000;
+	u32 f24_mhz = 24000000;
+	u32 f25_mhz = 25000000;
+	u32 f38_4_mhz = 38400000;
 	u32 crystal_clock = (rpm_config_reg &
 			     GEN11_RPM_CONFIG0_CRYSTAL_CLOCK_FREQ_MASK) >>
 			    GEN11_RPM_CONFIG0_CRYSTAL_CLOCK_FREQ_SHIFT;
@@ -735,9 +735,9 @@ static u32 gen11_get_crystal_clock_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 
 static u32 read_timestamp_frequency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
-	u32 f12_5_mhz = 12500;
-	u32 f19_2_mhz = 19200;
-	u32 f24_mhz = 24000;
+	u32 f12_5_mhz = 12500000;
+	u32 f19_2_mhz = 19200000;
+	u32 f24_mhz = 24000000;
 
 	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 4) {
 		/* PRMs say:
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static u32 read_timestamp_frequency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		 *      hclks." (through the “Clocking Configuration”
 		 *      (“CLKCFG”) MCHBAR register)
 		 */
-		return RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->rawclk_freq / 16;
+		return RUNTIME_INFO(dev_priv)->rawclk_freq * 1000 / 16;
 	} else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 8) {
 		/* PRMs say:
 		 *
@@ -1050,11 +1050,11 @@ void intel_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm, "rawclk rate: %d kHz\n", runtime->rawclk_freq);
 
 	/* Initialize command stream timestamp frequency */
-	runtime->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz =
+	runtime->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz =
 		read_timestamp_frequency(dev_priv);
-	if (runtime->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz) {
+	if (runtime->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz) {
 		runtime->cs_timestamp_period_ns =
-			div_u64(1e6, runtime->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz);
+			div_u64(1e9, runtime->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
 		drm_dbg(&dev_priv->drm,
 			"CS timestamp wraparound in %lldms\n",
 			div_u64(mul_u32_u32(runtime->cs_timestamp_period_ns,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
index 1ecb9df2de91..432e9c7c0fe7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ struct intel_runtime_info {
 
 	u32 rawclk_freq;
 
-	u32 cs_timestamp_frequency_khz;
+	u32 cs_timestamp_frequency_hz;
 	u32 cs_timestamp_period_ns;
 
 	/* Media engine access to SFC per instance */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c
index d1a1568c47ba..dea0c5dd2739 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c
@@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ static int live_noa_delay(void *arg)
 
 	delay = intel_read_status_page(stream->engine, 0x102);
 	delay -= intel_read_status_page(stream->engine, 0x100);
-	delay = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(delay, 1000 * 1000),
-			RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_khz);
+	delay = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(delay, 1000000000),
+			RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->cs_timestamp_frequency_hz);
 	pr_info("GPU delay: %uns, expected %lluns\n",
 		delay, expected);
 
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-02 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-02 14:39 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Nuke pointless div by 64bit Ville Syrjala
2020-03-02 14:39 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2020-05-13 15:04   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Store CS timestamp frequency in Hz Chris Wilson
2020-05-13 15:08   ` Lionel Landwerlin
2020-03-02 14:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Fix cs_timestamp_frequency_hz for ctg/elk/ilk Ville Syrjala
2020-03-02 14:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Fix cs_timestamp_frequency_hz for cl/bw Ville Syrjala
2020-03-02 14:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Extract i915_cs_timestamp_{ns_to_ticks, tick_to_ns}() Ville Syrjala
2020-05-13 15:09   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-02 14:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/selftests: Make the CS timestamp tests work on gen4-snb (sort of) Ville Syrjala
2020-05-17 12:49   ` Chris Wilson
2020-03-02 14:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Nuke pointless div by 64bit Patchwork
2020-03-02 15:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2020-03-02 15:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-03-03  1:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-05-13 14:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] " Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200302143943.32676-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).