intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: fernando.pacheco@intel.com, Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/37] drm/i915/dg1: enable PORT C/D aka D/E
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 17:38:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200521003803.18936-35-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200521003803.18936-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

For DG1 we have a little of mix up wrt to DDI/port names and indexes.
Bspec refers to the ports as DDIA, DDIB, DDI USBC1 and DDI USBC2
(besides the DDIA, DDIB, DDIC, DDID), but the previous naming is the
most unambiguous one. This means that for any register on Display Engine
we should use the index of A, B, D and E. However in some places this is
not true:

- VBT: uses C and D and have to be mapped to D/E

- IO/Combo: uses C and D, but we already differentiate those when
  we created the phy vs port distinction.

Ths additional mapping for VBT and phy are already covered in previous
patches, so now we can initialize the DDI as D/E.

Cc: Clinton Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 016f02d912e0..7f4e51ff0d63 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -7213,10 +7213,7 @@ bool intel_phy_is_combo(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
 {
 	if (phy == PHY_NONE)
 		return false;
-	else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv))
-		/* FIXME: Enable only two ports for now */
-		return phy <= PHY_B;
-	else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv))
+	else if (IS_DG1(dev_priv) || IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv))
 		return phy <= PHY_D;
 	else if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv))
 		return phy <= PHY_C;
@@ -7240,7 +7237,7 @@ bool intel_phy_is_tc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum phy phy)
 
 enum phy intel_port_to_phy(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum port port)
 {
-	if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) && port >= PORT_D)
+	if ((IS_DG1(i915) || IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915)) && port >= PORT_D)
 		return (enum phy)port - 1;
 	else if (IS_ELKHARTLAKE(i915) && port == PORT_D)
 		return PHY_A;
@@ -16763,9 +16760,18 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		return;
 
 	if (IS_DG1(dev_priv)) {
-		/* FIXME: Enable only two ports for now */
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
 		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
+
+		/*
+		 * Bspec lists the ports as A, B, C (USBC1) and D (USBC2).
+		 * However from the Display Engine perspective all registers are
+		 * actually wired to handle C and D as offsets of D/E. Instead
+		 * of fighting all our macros for handling them specially for
+		 * DG1, just call them D/E
+		 */
+		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
+		intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
 	} else if (IS_ROCKETLAKE(dev_priv)) {
 		/*
 		 * If HTI (aka HDPORT) is enabled at boot, it may have taken
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-21  0:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-21  0:37 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/37] Introduce DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/37] drm/i915/rkl: Add DPLL4 support Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/37] drm/i915/rkl: Add DDC pin mapping Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/37] drm/i915/rkl: Setup ports/phys Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/37] drm/i915/rkl: provide port/phy mapping for vbt Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/37] drm/i915/rkl: Handle HTI Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/37] drm/i915/rkl: Handle comp master/slave relationships for PHYs Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/37] drm/i915/rkl: Add initial workarounds Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/37] drm/i915: make intel_{uncore, de}_rmw() more useful Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21 17:24   ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-21 17:30     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/37] drm/i915: Add has_master_unit_irq flag Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-26 18:10   ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/37] drm/i915: add pcie snoop flag Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  8:15   ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/37] drm/i915/dg1: add initial DG-1 definitions Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-26 17:34   ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-26 17:51     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-26 18:02       ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-26 17:51   ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/37] drm/i915/dg1: Add DG1 PCI IDs Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-26 17:35   ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/37] drm/i915/dg1: Add fake PCH Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/37] drm/i915/dg1: Initialize RAWCLK properly Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/37] drm/i915/dg1: Define MOCS table for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/37] drm/i915/dg1: Add DG1 power wells Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/37] drm/i915/dg1: Increase mmio size to 4MB Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/37] drm/i915/dg1: add support for the master unit interrupt Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-26 18:02   ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/37] drm/i915/dg1: Wait for pcode/uncore handshake at startup Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/37] drm/i915/dg1: Add DPLL macros for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/37] drm/i915/dg1: Add and setup DPLLs " Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/37] drm/i915/dg1: Enable DPLL " Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/37] drm/i915/dg1: add hpd interrupt handling Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/37] drm/i915/dg1: invert HPD pins Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/37] drm/i915/dg1: gmbus pin mapping Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/37] drm/i915/dg1: Handle GRF/IC ECC error irq Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  8:19   ` Chris Wilson
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/37] drm/i915/dg1: Log counter on SLM ECC error Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/37] drm/i915/dg1: Enable first 2 ports for DG1 Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/37] drm/i915/dg1: Don't program PHY_MISC for PHY-C and PHY-D Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/37] drm/i915/dg1: Update comp master/slave relationships for PHYs Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/37] drm/i915/dg1: Update voltage swing tables for DP Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/37] drm/i915/dg1: provide port/phy mapping for vbt Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/37] drm/i915/dg1: map/unmap pll clocks Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:38 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2020-05-21  0:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/37] drm/i915/dg1: Load DMC Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-26 17:42   ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-26 17:49     ` Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/37] drm/i915/dg1: Add initial DG1 workarounds Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-21  0:38 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/37] drm/i915/dg1: Remove SHPD_FILTER_CNT register programming Lucas De Marchi
2020-05-26 17:44   ` Souza, Jose
2020-05-21  1:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Introduce DG1 Patchwork
2020-05-21  1:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-05-21  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-21 18:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200521003803.18936-35-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=fernando.pacheco@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).