Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/gup, drm/i915: refactor gup_fast, convert to pin_user_pages()
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 22:19:27 -0700
Message-ID: <20200522051931.54191-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> (raw)

The purpose of posting this series is to launch a test in the
intel-gfx-ci tree. (The patches have already been merged into Andrew's
linux-mm tree.)

This applies to today's linux.git (note the base-commit tag at the
bottom).

Changes since V1:

* Fixed a bug in the refactoring patch: added FOLL_FAST_ONLY to the
  list of gup_flags *not* to WARN() on. This lead to a failure in the
  first intel-gfx-ci test run [1].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/159008745422.32320.5724805750977048669@build.alporthouse.com

Original cover letter:

This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c
routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the
drm/i915 folks, because I haven't been able to run-time test that part
of it.

Otherwise, though, the series has passed my basic run time testing:
some LTP tests, some xfs and etx4 non-destructive xfstests, and an
assortment of other smaller ones: vm selftests, io_uring_register, a
few more. But that's only on one particular machine. Also, cross-compile
tests for half a dozen arches all pass.

Details:

In order to convert the drm/i915 driver from get_user_pages() to
pin_user_pages(), a FOLL_PIN equivalent of __get_user_pages_fast() was
required. That led to refactoring __get_user_pages_fast(), with the
following goals:

1) As above: provide a pin_user_pages*() routine for drm/i915 to call,
   in place of __get_user_pages_fast(),

2) Get rid of the gup.c duplicate code for walking page tables with
   interrupts disabled. This duplicate code is a minor maintenance
   problem anyway.

3) Make it easy for an upcoming patch from Souptick, which aims to
   convert __get_user_pages_fast() to use a gup_flags argument, instead
   of a bool writeable arg.  Also, if this series looks good, we can
   ask Souptick to change the name as well, to whatever the consensus
   is. My initial recommendation is: get_user_pages_fast_only(), to
   match the new pin_user_pages_only().

John Hubbard (4):
  mm/gup: move __get_user_pages_fast() down a few lines in gup.c
  mm/gup: refactor and de-duplicate gup_fast() code
  mm/gup: introduce pin_user_pages_fast_only()
  drm/i915: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages()

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c |  22 +--
 include/linux/mm.h                          |   3 +
 mm/gup.c                                    | 153 ++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)


base-commit: 051143e1602d90ea71887d92363edd539d411de5
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply index

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-22  5:19 John Hubbard [this message]
2020-05-22  5:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/gup: move __get_user_pages_fast() down a few lines in gup.c John Hubbard
2020-05-22  5:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/gup: refactor and de-duplicate gup_fast() code John Hubbard
2020-05-22  5:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/gup: introduce pin_user_pages_fast_only() John Hubbard
2020-05-22  5:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/i915: convert get_user_pages() --> pin_user_pages() John Hubbard
2020-05-23  9:41 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] mm/gup, drm/i915: refactor gup_fast, convert to pin_user_pages() Chris Wilson
2020-05-23 22:33   ` John Hubbard
2020-05-23 18:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-05-23 18:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-05-23 20:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-05-23 21:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200522051931.54191-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jrdr.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/0 intel-gfx/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 intel-gfx intel-gfx/ https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx \
		intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
	public-inbox-index intel-gfx

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git