intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/66] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:51:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715115147.11866-38-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715115147.11866-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Rather than going back and forth between the rb_node entry and the
virtual_engine type, store the ve local and reuse it. As the
container_of conversion from rb_node to virtual_engine requires a
variable offset, performing that conversion just once shaves off a bit
of code.

v2: Keep a single virtual engine lookup, for typical use.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 254 ++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index fabb20a6800b..ec533dfe3be9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -453,9 +453,15 @@ static int queue_prio(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
 	return ((p->priority + 1) << I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT) - ffs(p->used);
 }
 
+static int virtual_prio(const struct intel_engine_execlists *el)
+{
+	struct rb_node *rb = rb_first_cached(&el->virtual);
+
+	return rb ? rb_entry(rb, struct ve_node, rb)->prio : INT_MIN;
+}
+
 static inline bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-				const struct i915_request *rq,
-				struct rb_node *rb)
+				const struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	int last_prio;
 
@@ -492,25 +498,6 @@ static inline bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	    rq_prio(list_next_entry(rq, sched.link)) > last_prio)
 		return true;
 
-	if (rb) {
-		struct virtual_engine *ve =
-			rb_entry(rb, typeof(*ve), nodes[engine->id].rb);
-		bool preempt = false;
-
-		if (engine == ve->siblings[0]) { /* only preempt one sibling */
-			struct i915_request *next;
-
-			rcu_read_lock();
-			next = READ_ONCE(ve->request);
-			if (next)
-				preempt = rq_prio(next) > last_prio;
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-		}
-
-		if (preempt)
-			return preempt;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * If the inflight context did not trigger the preemption, then maybe
 	 * it was the set of queued requests? Pick the highest priority in
@@ -521,7 +508,8 @@ static inline bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	 * ELSP[0] or ELSP[1] as, thanks again to PI, if it was the same
 	 * context, it's priority would not exceed ELSP[0] aka last_prio.
 	 */
-	return queue_prio(&engine->execlists) > last_prio;
+	return max(virtual_prio(&engine->execlists),
+		   queue_prio(&engine->execlists)) > last_prio;
 }
 
 __maybe_unused static inline bool
@@ -1806,6 +1794,35 @@ static bool virtual_matches(const struct virtual_engine *ve,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static struct virtual_engine *
+first_virtual_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	struct intel_engine_execlists *el = &engine->execlists;
+	struct rb_node *rb = rb_first_cached(&el->virtual);
+
+	while (rb) {
+		struct virtual_engine *ve =
+			rb_entry(rb, typeof(*ve), nodes[engine->id].rb);
+		struct i915_request *rq = READ_ONCE(ve->request);
+
+		/* lazily cleanup after another engine handled rq */
+		if (!rq) {
+			rb_erase_cached(rb, &el->virtual);
+			RB_CLEAR_NODE(rb);
+			rb = rb_first_cached(&el->virtual);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		if (!virtual_matches(ve, rq, engine)) {
+			rb = rb_next(rb);
+			continue;
+		}
+		return ve;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 static void virtual_xfer_breadcrumbs(struct virtual_engine *ve)
 {
 	/*
@@ -1889,32 +1906,15 @@ static void defer_active(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 
 static bool
 need_timeslice(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-	       const struct i915_request *rq,
-	       const struct rb_node *rb)
+	       const struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	int hint;
 
 	if (!intel_engine_has_timeslices(engine))
 		return false;
 
-	hint = engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint;
-
-	if (rb) {
-		const struct virtual_engine *ve =
-			rb_entry(rb, typeof(*ve), nodes[engine->id].rb);
-		const struct intel_engine_cs *inflight =
-			intel_context_inflight(&ve->context);
-
-		if (!inflight || inflight == engine) {
-			struct i915_request *next;
-
-			rcu_read_lock();
-			next = READ_ONCE(ve->request);
-			if (next)
-				hint = max(hint, rq_prio(next));
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-		}
-	}
+	hint = max(engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint,
+		   virtual_prio(&engine->execlists));
 
 	if (!list_is_last(&rq->sched.link, &engine->active.requests))
 		hint = max(hint, rq_prio(list_next_entry(rq, sched.link)));
@@ -2053,6 +2053,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	struct i915_request **port = execlists->pending;
 	struct i915_request ** const last_port = port + execlists->port_mask;
 	struct i915_request * const *active = execlists->active;
+	struct virtual_engine *ve;
 	struct i915_request *last;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rb_node *rb;
@@ -2081,26 +2082,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->active.lock, flags);
 
-	for (rb = rb_first_cached(&execlists->virtual); rb; ) {
-		struct virtual_engine *ve =
-			rb_entry(rb, typeof(*ve), nodes[engine->id].rb);
-		struct i915_request *rq = READ_ONCE(ve->request);
-
-		if (!rq) { /* lazily cleanup after another engine handled rq */
-			rb_erase_cached(rb, &execlists->virtual);
-			RB_CLEAR_NODE(rb);
-			rb = rb_first_cached(&execlists->virtual);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		if (!virtual_matches(ve, rq, engine)) {
-			rb = rb_next(rb);
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		break;
-	}
-
 	/*
 	 * If the queue is higher priority than the last
 	 * request in the currently active context, submit afresh.
@@ -2123,7 +2104,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	if ((last = *active)) {
 		if (i915_request_completed(last)) {
 			goto check_secondary;
-		} else if (need_preempt(engine, last, rb)) {
+		} else if (need_preempt(engine, last)) {
 			ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
 				     "preempting last=%llx:%lld, prio=%d, hint=%d\n",
 				     last->fence.context,
@@ -2149,7 +2130,7 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 			__unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
 
 			last = NULL;
-		} else if (need_timeslice(engine, last, rb) &&
+		} else if (need_timeslice(engine, last) &&
 			   timeslice_expired(execlists, last)) {
 			ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
 				     "expired last=%llx:%lld, prio=%d, hint=%d, yield?=%s\n",
@@ -2201,111 +2182,98 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 		}
 	}
 
-	while (rb) { /* XXX virtual is always taking precedence */
-		struct virtual_engine *ve =
-			rb_entry(rb, typeof(*ve), nodes[engine->id].rb);
+	/* XXX virtual is always taking precedence */
+	while ((ve = first_virtual_engine(engine))) {
 		struct i915_request *rq;
 
 		spin_lock(&ve->base.active.lock);
 
 		rq = ve->request;
-		if (unlikely(!rq)) { /* lost the race to a sibling */
-			spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
-			rb_erase_cached(rb, &execlists->virtual);
-			RB_CLEAR_NODE(rb);
-			rb = rb_first_cached(&execlists->virtual);
-			continue;
-		}
+		if (unlikely(!rq)) /* lost the race to a sibling */
+			goto unlock;
 
-		GEM_BUG_ON(rq != ve->request);
 		GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine != &ve->base);
 		GEM_BUG_ON(rq->context != &ve->context);
 
-		if (rq_prio(rq) >= queue_prio(execlists)) {
-			if (!virtual_matches(ve, rq, engine)) {
-				spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
-				rb = rb_next(rb);
-				continue;
-			}
+		if (unlikely(rq_prio(rq) < queue_prio(execlists))) {
+			spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
+			break;
+		}
 
-			if (last && !can_merge_rq(last, rq)) {
-				spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
-				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
-				start_timeslice(engine, rq_prio(rq));
-				return; /* leave this for another sibling */
-			}
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!virtual_matches(ve, rq, engine));
 
-			ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
-				     "virtual rq=%llx:%lld%s, new engine? %s\n",
-				     rq->fence.context,
-				     rq->fence.seqno,
-				     i915_request_completed(rq) ? "!" :
-				     i915_request_started(rq) ? "*" :
-				     "",
-				     yesno(engine != ve->siblings[0]));
-
-			WRITE_ONCE(ve->request, NULL);
-			WRITE_ONCE(ve->base.execlists.queue_priority_hint,
-				   INT_MIN);
-			rb_erase_cached(rb, &execlists->virtual);
-			RB_CLEAR_NODE(rb);
+		if (last && !can_merge_rq(last, rq)) {
+			spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
+			start_timeslice(engine, rq_prio(rq));
+			return; /* leave this for another sibling */
+		}
 
-			GEM_BUG_ON(!(rq->execution_mask & engine->mask));
-			WRITE_ONCE(rq->engine, engine);
+		ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
+			     "virtual rq=%llx:%lld%s, new engine? %s\n",
+			     rq->fence.context,
+			     rq->fence.seqno,
+			     i915_request_completed(rq) ? "!" :
+			     i915_request_started(rq) ? "*" :
+			     "",
+			     yesno(engine != ve->siblings[0]));
 
-			if (engine != ve->siblings[0]) {
-				u32 *regs = ve->context.lrc_reg_state;
-				unsigned int n;
+		WRITE_ONCE(ve->request, NULL);
+		WRITE_ONCE(ve->base.execlists.queue_priority_hint, INT_MIN);
 
-				GEM_BUG_ON(READ_ONCE(ve->context.inflight));
+		rb = &ve->nodes[engine->id].rb;
+		rb_erase_cached(rb, &execlists->virtual);
+		RB_CLEAR_NODE(rb);
 
-				if (!intel_engine_has_relative_mmio(engine))
-					virtual_update_register_offsets(regs,
-									engine);
+		GEM_BUG_ON(!(rq->execution_mask & engine->mask));
+		WRITE_ONCE(rq->engine, engine);
 
-				if (!list_empty(&ve->context.signals))
-					virtual_xfer_breadcrumbs(ve);
+		if (engine != ve->siblings[0]) {
+			u32 *regs = ve->context.lrc_reg_state;
+			unsigned int n;
 
-				/*
-				 * Move the bound engine to the top of the list
-				 * for future execution. We then kick this
-				 * tasklet first before checking others, so that
-				 * we preferentially reuse this set of bound
-				 * registers.
-				 */
-				for (n = 1; n < ve->num_siblings; n++) {
-					if (ve->siblings[n] == engine) {
-						swap(ve->siblings[n],
-						     ve->siblings[0]);
-						break;
-					}
-				}
+			GEM_BUG_ON(READ_ONCE(ve->context.inflight));
 
-				GEM_BUG_ON(ve->siblings[0] != engine);
-			}
+			if (!intel_engine_has_relative_mmio(engine))
+				virtual_update_register_offsets(regs, engine);
 
-			if (__i915_request_submit(rq)) {
-				submit = true;
-				last = rq;
-			}
-			i915_request_put(rq);
+			if (!list_empty(&ve->context.signals))
+				virtual_xfer_breadcrumbs(ve);
 
 			/*
-			 * Hmm, we have a bunch of virtual engine requests,
-			 * but the first one was already completed (thanks
-			 * preempt-to-busy!). Keep looking at the veng queue
-			 * until we have no more relevant requests (i.e.
-			 * the normal submit queue has higher priority).
+			 * Move the bound engine to the top of the list for
+			 * future execution. We then kick this tasklet first
+			 * before checking others, so that we preferentially
+			 * reuse this set of bound registers.
 			 */
-			if (!submit) {
-				spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
-				rb = rb_first_cached(&execlists->virtual);
-				continue;
+			for (n = 1; n < ve->num_siblings; n++) {
+				if (ve->siblings[n] == engine) {
+					swap(ve->siblings[n], ve->siblings[0]);
+					break;
+				}
 			}
+
+			GEM_BUG_ON(ve->siblings[0] != engine);
+		}
+
+		if (__i915_request_submit(rq)) {
+			submit = true;
+			last = rq;
 		}
 
+		i915_request_put(rq);
+unlock:
 		spin_unlock(&ve->base.active.lock);
-		break;
+
+		/*
+		 * Hmm, we have a bunch of virtual engine requests,
+		 * but the first one was already completed (thanks
+		 * preempt-to-busy!). Keep looking at the veng queue
+		 * until we have no more relevant requests (i.e.
+		 * the normal submit queue has higher priority).
+		 */
+		if (submit)
+			break;
 	}
 
 	while ((rb = rb_first_cached(&execlists->queue))) {
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-15 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 154+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15 11:50 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/66] drm/i915: Reduce i915_request.lock contention for i915_request_wait Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/66] drm/i915: Remove i915_request.lock requirement for execution callbacks Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/66] drm/i915: Remove requirement for holding i915_request.lock for breadcrumbs Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/66] drm/i915: Add a couple of missing i915_active_fini() Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 12:00   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-21 12:23   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/66] drm/i915: Skip taking acquire mutex for no ref->active callback Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 12:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-21 12:32   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/66] drm/i915: Export a preallocate variant of i915_active_acquire() Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 12:21   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-17 12:45     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 13:06       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-21 15:33   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/66] drm/i915: Keep the most recently used active-fence upon discard Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 12:38   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 14:22     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-22  9:46   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/66] drm/i915: Make the stale cached active node available for any timeline Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 13:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 14:28     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 12:40       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-29 13:42         ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 13:53           ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 14:22           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-29 14:39             ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 14:52             ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 15:31               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-22 11:19   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:31     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/66] drm/i915: Provide a fastpath for waiting on vma bindings Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 13:23   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 14:35     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-29 12:43       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-22 15:07   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/66] drm/i915: Soften the tasklet flush frequency before waits Chris Wilson
2020-07-16 14:23   ` Mika Kuoppala
2020-07-22 15:10   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/66] drm/i915: Preallocate stashes for vma page-directories Chris Wilson
2020-07-20 10:35   ` Matthew Auld
2020-07-23 14:33   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:42     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  7:43       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-27  9:24   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:50     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-30 12:04       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-30 12:28       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-04 14:08         ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-04 16:14           ` Daniel Vetter
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/66] drm/i915: Switch to object allocations for page directories Chris Wilson
2020-07-20 10:34   ` Matthew Auld
2020-07-20 10:40     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/66] drm/i915/gem: Don't drop the timeline lock during execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-07-23 16:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:46     ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 14:51     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/66] drm/i915/gem: Rename execbuf.bind_link to unbound_link Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:11   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/66] drm/i915/gem: Break apart the early i915_vma_pin from execbuf object lookup Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:51   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove the call for no-evict i915_vma_pin Chris Wilson
2020-07-17 14:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 15:04     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-28  9:46   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 15:05     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:58       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/66] drm/i915: Add list_for_each_entry_safe_continue_reverse Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  8:59   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/66] drm/i915: Always defer fenced work to the worker Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  9:03   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-31 13:28     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 13:31       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/66] drm/i915/gem: Assign context id for async work Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/66] drm/i915/gem: Separate the ww_mutex walker into its own list Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  9:23   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/66] drm/i915/gem: Asynchronous GTT unbinding Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 13:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/66] drm/i915/gem: Bind the fence async for execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-07-27 18:19   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 15:08     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 13:12       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/66] drm/i915/gem: Include cmdparser in common execbuf pinning Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  9:43   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/66] drm/i915/gem: Include secure batch " Chris Wilson
2020-07-31  9:47   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/66] drm/i915/gem: Reintroduce multiple passes for reloc processing Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:05   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/66] drm/i915: Add an implementation for i915_gem_ww_ctx locking, v2 Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:07   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/66] drm/i915/gem: Pull execbuf dma resv under a single critical section Chris Wilson
2020-07-27 18:08   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-28 15:16     ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-30 12:57       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/66] drm/i915/gem: Replace i915_gem_object.mm.mutex with reservation_ww_class Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 15:43   ` Maarten Lankhorst
2020-07-16 15:53     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-28 11:17       ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-29  7:56         ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-29 12:17         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-07-29 13:44           ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-08-05 12:12             ` Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/66] drm/i915: Hold wakeref for the duration of the vma GGTT binding Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:09   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/66] drm/i915: Specialise " Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/66] drm/i915/gt: Acquire backing storage for the context Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:27   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/66] drm/i915/gt: Push the wait for the context to bound to the request Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:48   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/66] drm/i915: Remove unused i915_gem_evict_vm() Chris Wilson
2020-07-31 10:51   ` Thomas Hellström (Intel)
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/66] drm/i915/gt: Decouple completed requests on unwind Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/66] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/66] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/66] drm/i915/gt: Free stale request on destroying the virtual engine Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/66] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/66] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/66] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/66] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold() Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/66] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/66] drm/i915/gt: Drop atomic for engine->fw_active tracking Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/66] drm/i915/gt: Extract busy-stats for ring-scheduler Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/66] drm/i915/gt: Convert stats.active to plain unsigned int Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/66] drm/i915: Lift waiter/signaler iterators Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/66] drm/i915: Strip out internal priorities Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 49/66] drm/i915: Remove I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 50/66] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 51/66] drm/i915/gt: Do not suspend bonded requests if one hangs Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 52/66] drm/i915: Teach the i915_dependency to use a double-lock Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/66] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 54/66] drm/i915/gt: Remove timeslice suppression Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 55/66] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 15:33   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 56/66] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 57/66] drm/i915: Replace the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 58/66] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection to the GT Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 59/66] Restore "drm/i915: drop engine_pin/unpin_breadcrumbs_irq" Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 60/66] drm/i915/gt: Couple tasklet scheduling for all CS interrupts Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 61/66] drm/i915/gt: Support creation of 'internal' rings Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 62/66] drm/i915/gt: Use client timeline address for seqno writes Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 63/66] drm/i915/gt: Infrastructure for ring scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 64/66] drm/i915/gt: Implement ring scheduler for gen6/7 Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 65/66] drm/i915/gt: Enable ring scheduling " Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 11:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 66/66] drm/i915/gem: Remove timeline nesting from snb relocs Chris Wilson
2020-07-15 13:27 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/66] drm/i915: Reduce i915_request.lock contention for i915_request_wait Patchwork
2020-07-15 13:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-15 14:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-15 15:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/66] drm/i915: Reduce i915_request.lock contention for i915_request_wait (rev2) Patchwork
2020-07-15 15:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-07-15 16:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-07-15 19:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2020-07-23 20:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/66] drm/i915: Reduce i915_request.lock contention for i915_request_wait Dave Airlie
2020-07-27  9:35   ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200715115147.11866-38-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).