intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/42] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised
Date: Sun,  2 Aug 2020 17:43:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200802164412.2738-23-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200802164412.2738-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Since schedule-in and schedule-out are now both always under the tasklet
bitlock, we can reduce the individual atomic operations to simple
instructions and worry less.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 44 +++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 0d072356cf21..e3dccdc53faf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ __execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq)
 		unsigned int tag = ffs(READ_ONCE(engine->context_tag));
 
 		GEM_BUG_ON(tag == 0 || tag >= BITS_PER_LONG);
-		clear_bit(tag - 1, &engine->context_tag);
+		__clear_bit(tag - 1, &engine->context_tag);
 		ce->lrc.ccid = tag << (GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32);
 
 		BUILD_BUG_ON(BITS_PER_LONG > GEN12_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID);
@@ -1360,13 +1360,10 @@ static inline void execlists_schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq, int idx)
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_pm_is_awake(rq->engine));
 	trace_i915_request_in(rq, idx);
 
-	old = READ_ONCE(ce->inflight);
-	do {
-		if (!old) {
-			WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, __execlists_schedule_in(rq));
-			break;
-		}
-	} while (!try_cmpxchg(&ce->inflight, &old, ptr_inc(old)));
+	old = ce->inflight;
+	if (!old)
+		old = __execlists_schedule_in(rq);
+	WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, ptr_inc(old));
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_inflight(ce) != rq->engine);
 }
@@ -1404,12 +1401,11 @@ static void kick_siblings(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce)
 		resubmit_virtual_request(rq, ve);
 }
 
-static inline void
-__execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
-			 struct intel_engine_cs * const engine,
-			 unsigned int ccid)
+static inline void __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_context * const ce = rq->context;
+	struct intel_engine_cs * const engine = rq->engine;
+	unsigned int ccid;
 
 	/*
 	 * NB process_csb() is not under the engine->active.lock and hence
@@ -1417,7 +1413,7 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
 	 * refrain from doing non-trivial work here.
 	 */
 
-	CE_TRACE(ce, "schedule-out, ccid:%x\n", ccid);
+	CE_TRACE(ce, "schedule-out, ccid:%x\n", ce->lrc.ccid);
 
 	/*
 	 * If we have just completed this context, the engine may now be
@@ -1427,12 +1423,13 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
 	    i915_request_completed(rq))
 		intel_engine_add_retire(engine, ce->timeline);
 
+	ccid = ce->lrc.ccid;
 	ccid >>= GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32;
 	ccid &= GEN12_MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID;
 	if (ccid < BITS_PER_LONG) {
 		GEM_BUG_ON(ccid == 0);
 		GEM_BUG_ON(test_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag));
-		set_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag);
+		__set_bit(ccid - 1, &engine->context_tag);
 	}
 
 	intel_context_update_runtime(ce);
@@ -1453,26 +1450,23 @@ __execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq,
 	 */
 	if (ce->engine != engine)
 		kick_siblings(rq, ce);
-
-	intel_context_put(ce);
 }
 
 static inline void
 execlists_schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	struct intel_context * const ce = rq->context;
-	struct intel_engine_cs *cur, *old;
-	u32 ccid;
 
 	trace_i915_request_out(rq);
 
-	ccid = rq->context->lrc.ccid;
-	old = READ_ONCE(ce->inflight);
-	do
-		cur = ptr_unmask_bits(old, 2) ? ptr_dec(old) : NULL;
-	while (!try_cmpxchg(&ce->inflight, &old, cur));
-	if (!cur)
-		__execlists_schedule_out(rq, old, ccid);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->inflight);
+	ce->inflight = ptr_dec(ce->inflight);
+	if (!intel_context_inflight_count(ce)) {
+		GEM_BUG_ON(ce->inflight != rq->engine);
+		__execlists_schedule_out(rq);
+		WRITE_ONCE(ce->inflight, NULL);
+		intel_context_put(ce);
+	}
 
 	i915_request_put(rq);
 }
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-02 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-02 16:43 [Intel-gfx] Time, where did it go? Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/42] drm/i915/gem: Don't drop the timeline lock during execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce context termination list iteration guard to RCU Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/42] drm/i915/gt: Protect context lifetime with RCU Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/42] drm/i915/gt: Free stale request on destroying the virtual engine Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/42] drm/i915/gt: Track signaled breadcrumbs outside of the breadcrumb spinlock Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/42] drm/i915/gt: Split the breadcrumb spinlock between global and contexts Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/42] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock serialisation around await_start Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/42] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock requirement for intel_rps_boost() Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce ctx->engine_mutex for reading the clone source Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce ctx->engines_mutex for get_engines() Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/42] drm/i915: Reduce test_and_set_bit to set_bit in i915_request_submit() Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/42] drm/i915/gt: Decouple completed requests on unwind Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/42] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/42] drm/i915/gt: Refactor heartbeat request construction and submission Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/42] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/42] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/42] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/42] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/42] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/42] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold() Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/42] drm/i915/gt: Drop atomic for engine->fw_active tracking Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/42] drm/i915/gt: Extract busy-stats for ring-scheduler Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/42] drm/i915/gt: Convert stats.active to plain unsigned int Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/42] drm/i915: Lift waiter/signaler iterators Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/42] drm/i915: Strip out internal priorities Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/42] drm/i915: Remove I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/42] drm/i915/gt: Defer the kmem_cache_free() until after the HW submit Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/42] drm/i915: Prune empty priolists Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/42] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/42] drm/i915/gt: Do not suspend bonded requests if one hangs Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/42] drm/i915: Teach the i915_dependency to use a double-lock Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/42] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/42] drm/i915/selftests: Measure set-priority duration Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/42] drm/i915: Improve DFS for priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/42] drm/i915/gt: Remove timeslice suppression Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/42] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/42] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/42] drm/i915: Replace the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/42] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection back to the context Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/42] drm/i915/gt: Another tweak for flushing the tasklets Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Patchwork
2020-08-02 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-08-02 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-08-02 17:56 ` [Intel-gfx] Time, where did it go? Dave Airlie
2020-08-02 19:36   ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-04 21:45     ` Dave Airlie
2020-08-07  7:12       ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-09 20:01         ` Dave Airlie
2020-08-02 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200802164412.2738-23-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).