Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/42] drm/i915: Restructure priority inheritance
Date: Sun,  2 Aug 2020 17:44:04 +0100
Message-ID: <20200802164412.2738-35-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200802164412.2738-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

In anticipation of wanting to be able to call pi from underneath an
engine's active.lock, rework the priority inheritance to primarily work
along an engine's priority queue, delegating any other engine that the
chain may traverse to a worker. This reduces the global spinlock from
governing the entire priority inheritance depth-first search, to a small
lock around a single list.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c       | 299 ++++++++++++--------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h |   6 +-
 2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
index 247d2e2bb3c8..45e000c257db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
@@ -17,7 +17,70 @@ static struct i915_global_scheduler {
 	struct kmem_cache *slab_priorities;
 } global;
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(schedule_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ipi_lock);
+static LIST_HEAD(ipi_list);
+
+static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+	return READ_ONCE(rq->sched.attr.priority);
+}
+
+static void ipi_schedule(struct irq_work *wrk)
+{
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	do {
+		struct i915_dependency *p;
+		struct i915_request *rq;
+		int prio;
+
+		spin_lock(&ipi_lock);
+		p = list_first_entry_or_null(&ipi_list, typeof(*p), ipi_link);
+		if (p) {
+			rq = container_of(p->signaler, typeof(*rq), sched);
+			list_del_init(&p->ipi_link);
+
+			prio = p->ipi_priority;
+			p->ipi_priority = I915_PRIORITY_INVALID;
+		}
+		spin_unlock(&ipi_lock);
+		if (!p)
+			break;
+
+		if (i915_request_completed(rq))
+			continue;
+
+		i915_request_set_priority(rq, prio);
+	} while (1);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+static DEFINE_IRQ_WORK(ipi_work, ipi_schedule);
+
+static void ipi_queue(struct i915_dependency *p)
+{
+	list_move(&p->ipi_link, &ipi_list);
+	irq_work_queue(&ipi_work);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Virtual engines complicate acquiring the engine timeline lock,
+ * as their rq->engine pointer is not stable until under that
+ * engine lock. The simple ploy we use is to take the lock then
+ * check that the rq still belongs to the newly locked engine.
+ */
+#define lock_engine_irqsave(rq, flags) ({ \
+	struct i915_request * const rq__ = (rq); \
+	struct intel_engine_cs *engine__ = READ_ONCE(rq__->engine); \
+\
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine__->active.lock, (flags)); \
+	while (engine__ != READ_ONCE((rq__)->engine)) { \
+		spin_unlock(&engine__->active.lock); \
+		engine__ = READ_ONCE(rq__->engine); \
+		spin_lock(&engine__->active.lock); \
+	} \
+\
+	engine__; \
+})
 
 static const struct i915_request *
 node_to_request(const struct i915_sched_node *node)
@@ -162,42 +225,6 @@ void i915_priolist_free_many(struct list_head *list)
 	}
 }
 
-struct sched_cache {
-	struct list_head *priolist;
-};
-
-static struct intel_engine_cs *
-sched_lock_engine(const struct i915_sched_node *node,
-		  struct intel_engine_cs *locked,
-		  struct sched_cache *cache)
-{
-	const struct i915_request *rq = node_to_request(node);
-	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
-
-	GEM_BUG_ON(!locked);
-
-	/*
-	 * Virtual engines complicate acquiring the engine timeline lock,
-	 * as their rq->engine pointer is not stable until under that
-	 * engine lock. The simple ploy we use is to take the lock then
-	 * check that the rq still belongs to the newly locked engine.
-	 */
-	while (locked != (engine = READ_ONCE(rq->engine))) {
-		spin_unlock(&locked->active.lock);
-		memset(cache, 0, sizeof(*cache));
-		spin_lock(&engine->active.lock);
-		locked = engine;
-	}
-
-	GEM_BUG_ON(locked != engine);
-	return locked;
-}
-
-static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	return rq->sched.attr.priority;
-}
-
 static inline bool need_preempt(int prio, int active)
 {
 	/*
@@ -223,19 +250,17 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	if (prio <= engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint)
 		return;
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-
 	/* Nothing currently active? We're overdue for a submission! */
 	inflight = execlists_active(&engine->execlists);
 	if (!inflight)
-		goto unlock;
+		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * If we are already the currently executing context, don't
 	 * bother evaluating if we should preempt ourselves.
 	 */
 	if (inflight->context == rq->context)
-		goto unlock;
+		return;
 
 	ENGINE_TRACE(engine,
 		     "bumping queue-priority-hint:%d for rq:%llx:%lld, inflight:%llx:%lld prio %d\n",
@@ -247,30 +272,30 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
 	engine->execlists.queue_priority_hint = prio;
 	if (need_preempt(prio, rq_prio(inflight)))
 		tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
-
-unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node, int prio)
+static void ipi_priority(struct i915_dependency *p, int prio)
 {
-	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
-	struct i915_dependency *dep, *p;
-	struct i915_dependency stack;
-	struct sched_cache cache;
-	LIST_HEAD(dfs);
-
-	/* Needed in order to use the temporary link inside i915_dependency */
-	lockdep_assert_held(&schedule_lock);
-	GEM_BUG_ON(prio == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID);
-
-	if (node_signaled(node))
+	if (prio <= READ_ONCE(p->ipi_priority))
 		return;
 
-	prio = max(prio, node->attr.priority);
+	spin_lock(&ipi_lock);
+	if (prio > p->ipi_priority) {
+		p->ipi_priority = prio;
+		ipi_queue(p);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&ipi_lock);
+}
+
+static void __i915_request_set_priority(struct i915_request *rq, int prio)
+{
+	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine;
+	struct i915_request *rn;
+	struct list_head *plist;
+	LIST_HEAD(dfs);
 
-	stack.signaler = node;
-	list_add(&stack.dfs_link, &dfs);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&engine->active.lock);
+	list_add(&rq->sched.dfs, &dfs);
 
 	/*
 	 * Recursively bump all dependent priorities to match the new request.
@@ -290,66 +315,41 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node, int prio)
 	 * end result is a topological list of requests in reverse order, the
 	 * last element in the list is the request we must execute first.
 	 */
-	list_for_each_entry(dep, &dfs, dfs_link) {
-		struct i915_sched_node *node = dep->signaler;
+	list_for_each_entry(rq, &dfs, sched.dfs) {
+		struct i915_dependency *p;
 
-		/* If we are already flying, we know we have no signalers */
-		if (node_started(node))
-			continue;
+		/* Also release any children on this engine that are ready */
+		GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine != engine);
 
-		/*
-		 * Within an engine, there can be no cycle, but we may
-		 * refer to the same dependency chain multiple times
-		 * (redundant dependencies are not eliminated) and across
-		 * engines.
-		 */
-		list_for_each_entry(p, &node->signalers_list, signal_link) {
-			GEM_BUG_ON(p == dep); /* no cycles! */
+		for_each_signaler(p, rq) {
+			struct i915_request *s =
+				container_of(p->signaler, typeof(*s), sched);
 
-			if (node_signaled(p->signaler))
-				continue;
+			GEM_BUG_ON(s == rq);
 
-			if (prio > READ_ONCE(p->signaler->attr.priority))
-				list_move_tail(&p->dfs_link, &dfs);
-		}
-	}
+			if (rq_prio(s) >= prio)
+				continue;
 
-	/*
-	 * If we didn't need to bump any existing priorities, and we haven't
-	 * yet submitted this request (i.e. there is no potential race with
-	 * execlists_submit_request()), we can set our own priority and skip
-	 * acquiring the engine locks.
-	 */
-	if (node->attr.priority == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID) {
-		GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&node->link));
-		node->attr.priority = prio;
+			if (i915_request_completed(s))
+				continue;
 
-		if (stack.dfs_link.next == stack.dfs_link.prev)
-			return;
+			if (s->engine != rq->engine) {
+				ipi_priority(p, prio);
+				continue;
+			}
 
-		__list_del_entry(&stack.dfs_link);
+			list_move_tail(&s->sched.dfs, &dfs);
+		}
 	}
 
-	memset(&cache, 0, sizeof(cache));
-	engine = node_to_request(node)->engine;
-	spin_lock(&engine->active.lock);
-
-	/* Fifo and depth-first replacement ensure our deps execute before us */
-	engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine, &cache);
-	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(dep, p, &dfs, dfs_link) {
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->dfs_link);
-
-		node = dep->signaler;
-		engine = sched_lock_engine(node, engine, &cache);
-		lockdep_assert_held(&engine->active.lock);
+	plist = i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio);
 
-		/* Recheck after acquiring the engine->timeline.lock */
-		if (prio <= node->attr.priority || node_signaled(node))
-			continue;
-
-		GEM_BUG_ON(node_to_request(node)->engine != engine);
+	/* Fifo and depth-first replacement ensure our deps execute first */
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(rq, rn, &dfs, sched.dfs) {
+		GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine != engine);
 
-		WRITE_ONCE(node->attr.priority, prio);
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->sched.dfs);
+		WRITE_ONCE(rq->sched.attr.priority, prio);
 
 		/*
 		 * Once the request is ready, it will be placed into the
@@ -359,32 +359,73 @@ static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *node, int prio)
 		 * any preemption required, be dealt with upon submission.
 		 * See engine->submit_request()
 		 */
-		if (list_empty(&node->link))
+		if (!i915_request_is_ready(rq))
 			continue;
 
-		if (i915_request_in_priority_queue(node_to_request(node))) {
-			if (!cache.priolist)
-				cache.priolist =
-					i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine,
-								   prio);
-			list_move_tail(&node->link, cache.priolist);
-		}
+		if (i915_request_in_priority_queue(rq))
+			list_move_tail(&rq->sched.link, plist);
 
-		/* Defer (tasklet) submission until after all of our updates. */
-		kick_submission(engine, node_to_request(node), prio);
+		/* Defer (tasklet) submission until after all updates. */
+		kick_submission(engine, rq, prio);
 	}
-
-	spin_unlock(&engine->active.lock);
 }
 
 void i915_request_set_priority(struct i915_request *rq, int prio)
 {
-	if (!intel_engine_has_scheduler(rq->engine))
+	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (prio <= rq_prio(rq))
 		return;
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&schedule_lock);
-	__i915_schedule(&rq->sched, prio);
-	spin_unlock_irq(&schedule_lock);
+	/*
+	 * If we are setting the priority before being submitted, see if we
+	 * can quickly adjust our own priority in-situ and avoid taking
+	 * the contended engine->active.lock. If we need priority inheritance,
+	 * take the slow route.
+	 */
+	if (rq_prio(rq) == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID) {
+		struct i915_dependency *p;
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		for_each_signaler(p, rq) {
+			struct i915_request *s =
+				container_of(p->signaler, typeof(*s), sched);
+
+			if (rq_prio(s) >= prio)
+				continue;
+
+			if (i915_request_completed(s))
+				continue;
+
+			break;
+		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
+		if (&p->signal_link == &rq->sched.signalers_list &&
+		    cmpxchg(&rq->sched.attr.priority,
+			    I915_PRIORITY_INVALID,
+			    prio) == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID)
+			return;
+	}
+
+	engine = lock_engine_irqsave(rq, flags);
+	if (!intel_engine_has_scheduler(engine))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	if (i915_request_completed(rq))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	if (prio <= rq_prio(rq))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	__i915_request_set_priority(rq, prio);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	GEM_BUG_ON(rq_prio(rq) != prio);
+
+unlock:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->active.lock, flags);
 }
 
 void i915_sched_node_init(struct i915_sched_node *node)
@@ -394,6 +435,7 @@ void i915_sched_node_init(struct i915_sched_node *node)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->signalers_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->waiters_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->link);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->dfs);
 
 	i915_sched_node_reinit(node);
 }
@@ -432,7 +474,8 @@ bool __i915_sched_node_add_dependency(struct i915_sched_node *node,
 	spin_lock_irq(&signal->lock);
 
 	if (!node_signaled(signal)) {
-		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->dfs_link);
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dep->ipi_link);
+		dep->ipi_priority = I915_PRIORITY_INVALID;
 		dep->signaler = signal;
 		dep->waiter = node;
 		dep->flags = flags;
@@ -500,6 +543,12 @@ void i915_sched_node_retire(struct i915_sched_node *node)
 
 		GEM_BUG_ON(dep->signaler != node);
 
+		if (unlikely(!list_empty(&dep->ipi_link))) {
+			spin_lock(&ipi_lock);
+			list_del(&dep->ipi_link);
+			spin_unlock(&ipi_lock);
+		}
+
 		w = READ_ONCE(dep->waiter);
 		if (w) {
 			spin_lock_nested(&w->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
index 3246430eb1c1..ce60577df2bf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler_types.h
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ struct i915_sched_node {
 	spinlock_t lock; /* protect the lists */
 	struct list_head signalers_list; /* those before us, we depend upon */
 	struct list_head waiters_list; /* those after us, they depend upon us */
-	struct list_head link;
+	struct list_head link; /* guarded by engine->active.lock */
+	struct list_head dfs; /* guarded by engine->active.lock */
 	struct i915_sched_attr attr;
 	unsigned int flags;
 #define I915_SCHED_HAS_EXTERNAL_CHAIN	BIT(0)
@@ -75,11 +76,12 @@ struct i915_dependency {
 	struct i915_sched_node *waiter;
 	struct list_head signal_link;
 	struct list_head wait_link;
-	struct list_head dfs_link;
+	struct list_head ipi_link;
 	unsigned long flags;
 #define I915_DEPENDENCY_ALLOC		BIT(0)
 #define I915_DEPENDENCY_EXTERNAL	BIT(1)
 #define I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK		BIT(2)
+	int ipi_priority;
 };
 
 #define for_each_waiter(p__, rq__) \
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-02 16:43 [Intel-gfx] Time, where did it go? Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/42] drm/i915/gem: Don't drop the timeline lock during execbuf Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce context termination list iteration guard to RCU Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/42] drm/i915/gt: Protect context lifetime with RCU Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/42] drm/i915/gt: Free stale request on destroying the virtual engine Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/42] drm/i915/gt: Track signaled breadcrumbs outside of the breadcrumb spinlock Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/42] drm/i915/gt: Split the breadcrumb spinlock between global and contexts Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/42] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock serialisation around await_start Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/42] drm/i915: Drop i915_request.lock requirement for intel_rps_boost() Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce ctx->engine_mutex for reading the clone source Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/42] drm/i915/gem: Reduce ctx->engines_mutex for get_engines() Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/42] drm/i915: Reduce test_and_set_bit to set_bit in i915_request_submit() Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/42] drm/i915/gt: Decouple completed requests on unwind Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/42] drm/i915/gt: Check for a completed last request once Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/42] drm/i915/gt: Refactor heartbeat request construction and submission Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/42] drm/i915/gt: Replace direct submit with direct call to tasklet Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/42] drm/i915/gt: Use virtual_engine during execlists_dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/42] drm/i915/gt: Decouple inflight virtual engines Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/42] drm/i915/gt: Defer schedule_out until after the next dequeue Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/42] drm/i915/gt: Resubmit the virtual engine on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/42] drm/i915/gt: Simplify virtual engine handling for execlists_hold() Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/42] drm/i915/gt: ce->inflight updates are now serialised Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/42] drm/i915/gt: Drop atomic for engine->fw_active tracking Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/42] drm/i915/gt: Extract busy-stats for ring-scheduler Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/42] drm/i915/gt: Convert stats.active to plain unsigned int Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/42] drm/i915: Lift waiter/signaler iterators Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/42] drm/i915: Strip out internal priorities Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/42] drm/i915: Remove I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/42] drm/i915/gt: Defer the kmem_cache_free() until after the HW submit Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/42] drm/i915: Prune empty priolists Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/42] drm/i915: Replace engine->schedule() with a known request operation Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/42] drm/i915/gt: Do not suspend bonded requests if one hangs Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/42] drm/i915: Teach the i915_dependency to use a double-lock Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/42] drm/i915/selftests: Measure set-priority duration Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/42] drm/i915: Improve DFS for priority inheritance Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/42] drm/i915/gt: Remove timeslice suppression Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/42] drm/i915: Fair low-latency scheduling Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/42] drm/i915/gt: Specify a deadline for the heartbeat Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/42] drm/i915: Replace the priority boosting for the display with a deadline Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/42] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection back to the context Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 16:44 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/42] drm/i915/gt: Another tweak for flushing the tasklets Chris Wilson
2020-08-02 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Patchwork
2020-08-02 17:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-08-02 17:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-08-02 17:56 ` [Intel-gfx] Time, where did it go? Dave Airlie
2020-08-02 19:36   ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-04 21:45     ` Dave Airlie
2020-08-07  7:12       ` Chris Wilson
2020-08-09 20:01         ` Dave Airlie
2020-08-02 21:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [01/42] drm/i915: Fix wrong return value Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200802164412.2738-35-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Intel-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/0 intel-gfx/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/1 intel-gfx/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 intel-gfx intel-gfx/ https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx \
		intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
	public-inbox-index intel-gfx

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.freedesktop.lists.intel-gfx


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git