Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/atomic: document and enforce rules around "spurious" EBUSY

[Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4649 bytes --]

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:18:52 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
> pull in arbitrary other resources, including CRTCs (e.g. when
> reconfiguring global resources).
> 
> But in nonblocking mode userspace has then no idea this happened,
> which can lead to spurious EBUSY calls, both:
> - when that other CRTC is currently busy doing a page_flip the
>   ALLOW_MODESET commit can fail with an EBUSY
> - on the other CRTC a normal atomic flip can fail with EBUSY because
>   of the additional commit inserted by the kernel without userspace's
>   knowledge
> 
> For blocking commits this isn't a problem, because everyone else will
> just block until all the CRTC are reconfigured. Only thing userspace
> can notice is the dropped frames without any reason for why frames got
> dropped.
> 
> Consensus is that we need new uapi to handle this properly, but no one
> has any idea what exactly the new uapi should look like. Since this
> has been shipping for years already compositors need to deal no matter
> what, so as a first step just try to enforce this across drivers
> better with some checks.
> 
> v2: Add comments and a WARN_ON to enforce this only when allowed - we
> don't want to silently convert page flips into blocking plane updates
> just because the driver is buggy.
> 
> v3: Fix inverted WARN_ON (Pekka).
> 
> v4: Drop the uapi changes, only add a WARN_ON for now to enforce some
> rules for drivers.
> 
> v5: Make the WARNING more informative (Daniel)
> 
> v6: Add unconditional debug output for compositor hackers to figure
> out what's going on when they get an EBUSY (Daniel)

... gmail workaround ...

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> index 58527f151984..f1a912e80846 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_atomic_state_free);
>   * needed. It will also grab the relevant CRTC lock to make sure that the state
>   * is consistent.
>   *
> + * WARNING: Drivers may only add new CRTC states to a @state if
> + * drm_atomic_state.allow_modeset is set, or if it's a driver-internal commit
> + * not created by userspace through an IOCTL call.
> + *
>   * Returns:
>   *
>   * Either the allocated state or the error code encoded into the pointer. When
> @@ -1262,10 +1266,15 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  	struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
>  	struct drm_connector *conn;
>  	struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> +	unsigned requested_crtc = 0;
> +	unsigned affected_crtc = 0;
>  	int i, ret = 0;
>  
>  	DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("checking %p\n", state);
>  
> +	for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
> +		requested_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);

Is "old crtc state" the state that userspace is requesting as the new
state?

> +
>  	for_each_oldnew_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, new_plane_state, i) {
>  		ret = drm_atomic_plane_check(old_plane_state, new_plane_state);
>  		if (ret) {
> @@ -1313,6 +1322,26 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
> +		affected_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);

And after driver check processing, the "old crtc state" has been
modified by the driver to add anything it will necessarily need like
other CRTCs?

What is "new state" then?

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * For commits that allow modesets drivers can add other CRTCs to the
> +	 * atomic commit, e.g. when they need to reallocate global resources.
> +	 * This can cause spurious EBUSY, which robs compositors of a very
> +	 * effective sanity check for their drawing loop. Therefor only allow
> +	 * drivers to add unrelated CRTC states for modeset commits.
> +	 *
> +	 * FIXME: Should add affected_crtc mask to the ATOMIC IOCTL as an output
> +	 * so compositors know what's going on.
> +	 */
> +	if (affected_crtc != requested_crtc) {
> +		DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("driver added CRTC to commit: requested 0x%x, affected 0x%0x\n",
> +				 requested_crtc, affected_crtc);
> +		WARN(!state->allow_modeset, "adding CRTC not allowed without modesets: requested 0x%x, affected 0x%0x\n",
> +		     requested_crtc, affected_crtc);
> +	}

This hunk looks good to me.


Thanks,
pq

> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_check_only);


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx