intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/8] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_ddb_weight()
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 22:56:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210122205633.18492-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122205633.18492-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits() doesn't care how the weights
for distributing the ddb are caclculated for each pipe. Put that
calculation into a separate function so that such mundane details
are hidden from view.

v2: s/adjusted_mode/pipe_mode/

Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 9180db1bfda7..3b5e6836c246 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4077,6 +4077,24 @@ u32 skl_ddb_dbuf_slice_mask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	return slice_mask;
 }
 
+static unsigned int intel_crtc_ddb_weight(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
+{
+	const struct drm_display_mode *pipe_mode = &crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode;
+	int hdisplay, vdisplay;
+
+	if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Watermark/ddb requirement highly depends upon width of the
+	 * framebuffer, So instead of allocating DDB equally among pipes
+	 * distribute DDB based on resolution/width of the display.
+	 */
+	drm_mode_get_hv_timing(pipe_mode, &hdisplay, &vdisplay);
+
+	return hdisplay;
+}
+
 static u8 skl_compute_dbuf_slices(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
 				  u8 active_pipes);
 
@@ -4091,7 +4109,7 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
 	struct drm_crtc *for_crtc = crtc_state->uapi.crtc;
 	const struct intel_crtc *crtc;
-	u32 pipe_width = 0, total_width_in_range = 0, width_before_pipe_in_range = 0;
+	unsigned int pipe_weight = 0, total_weight = 0, weight_before_pipe = 0;
 	enum pipe for_pipe = to_intel_crtc(for_crtc)->pipe;
 	struct intel_dbuf_state *new_dbuf_state =
 		intel_atomic_get_new_dbuf_state(intel_state);
@@ -4160,18 +4178,11 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 */
 	ddb_range_size = hweight8(dbuf_slice_mask) * slice_size;
 
-	/*
-	 * Watermark/ddb requirement highly depends upon width of the
-	 * framebuffer, So instead of allocating DDB equally among pipes
-	 * distribute DDB based on resolution/width of the display.
-	 */
 	total_slice_mask = dbuf_slice_mask;
 	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(intel_state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
-		const struct drm_display_mode *pipe_mode =
-			&crtc_state->hw.pipe_mode;
 		enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
-		int hdisplay, vdisplay;
-		u32 pipe_dbuf_slice_mask;
+		unsigned int weight;
+		u8 pipe_dbuf_slice_mask;
 
 		if (!crtc_state->hw.active)
 			continue;
@@ -4198,14 +4209,13 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 		if (dbuf_slice_mask != pipe_dbuf_slice_mask)
 			continue;
 
-		drm_mode_get_hv_timing(pipe_mode, &hdisplay, &vdisplay);
-
-		total_width_in_range += hdisplay;
+		weight = intel_crtc_ddb_weight(crtc_state);
+		total_weight += weight;
 
 		if (pipe < for_pipe)
-			width_before_pipe_in_range += hdisplay;
+			weight_before_pipe += weight;
 		else if (pipe == for_pipe)
-			pipe_width = hdisplay;
+			pipe_weight = weight;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -4220,9 +4230,8 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	start = ddb_range_size * width_before_pipe_in_range / total_width_in_range;
-	end = ddb_range_size *
-		(width_before_pipe_in_range + pipe_width) / total_width_in_range;
+	start = ddb_range_size * weight_before_pipe / total_weight;
+	end = ddb_range_size * (weight_before_pipe + pipe_weight) / total_weight;
 
 	alloc->start = offset + start;
 	alloc->end = offset + end;
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-22 20:56 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/8] drm/i915: Remainder of dbuf state stuff Ville Syrjala
2021-01-22 20:56 ` Ville Syrjala [this message]
2021-01-22 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/8] drm/i915: Pass the crtc to skl_compute_dbuf_slices() Ville Syrjala
2021-01-22 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/8] drm/i915: Introduce intel_dbuf_slice_size() Ville Syrjala
2021-01-22 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/i915: Introduce skl_ddb_entry_for_slices() Ville Syrjala
2021-01-22 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/i915: Add pipe ddb entries into the dbuf state Ville Syrjala
2021-01-22 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 6/8] drm/i915: Extract intel_crtc_dbuf_weights() Ville Syrjala
2021-01-22 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/i915: Encapsulate dbuf state handling harder Ville Syrjala
2021-01-22 20:56 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/i915: Do a bit more initial readout for dbuf Ville Syrjala
2021-01-23  1:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remainder of dbuf state stuff (rev3) Patchwork
2021-01-23  1:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-01-23  2:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-23 12:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-01-24 22:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Remainder of dbuf state stuff (rev4) Patchwork
2021-01-24 22:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-01-24 23:03 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-01-25  0:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210122205633.18492-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).