From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/panfrost: Shrink sched_lock
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 18:52:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210623185250.7418a744@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210622165511.3169559-5-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:55:00 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> drm/scheduler requires a lock between _init and _push_job, but the
> reservation lock dance doesn't. So shrink the critical section a
> notch.
>
> v2: Lucas pointed out how this should really work, I got it all wrong
> in v1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Cc: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
> index 2df3e999a38d..38f8580c19f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
> @@ -224,14 +224,13 @@ int panfrost_job_push(struct panfrost_job *job)
> struct ww_acquire_ctx acquire_ctx;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&pfdev->sched_lock);
>
> ret = drm_gem_lock_reservations(job->bos, job->bo_count,
> &acquire_ctx);
> - if (ret) {
> - mutex_unlock(&pfdev->sched_lock);
> + if (ret)
> return ret;
> - }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pfdev->sched_lock);
>
> ret = drm_sched_job_init(&job->base, entity, NULL);
> if (ret) {
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-23 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-22 16:54 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] implicit fencing/dma-resv rules for shared buffers Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] dma-resv: Fix kerneldoc Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 18:19 ` Alex Deucher
2021-06-22 18:49 ` Sam Ravnborg
2021-06-22 19:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 8:31 ` Christian König
2021-06-23 15:15 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] dma-buf: Switch to inline kerneldoc Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 18:24 ` Alex Deucher
2021-06-22 19:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2021-06-22 19:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 8:32 ` Christian König
2021-06-23 16:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 17:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2021-06-22 16:54 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] dma-buf: Document dma-buf implicit fencing/resv fencing rules Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 8:41 ` Christian König
2021-06-23 16:19 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 6:59 ` Dave Airlie
2021-06-24 11:08 ` [Intel-gfx] [Mesa-dev] " Daniel Stone
2021-06-24 11:23 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/panfrost: Shrink sched_lock Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 16:52 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/panfrost: Use xarray and helpers for depedency tracking Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 16:51 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/panfrost: Fix implicit sync Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 16:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2021-06-23 19:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/atomic-helper: make drm_gem_plane_helper_prepare_fb the default Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 19:10 ` Sam Ravnborg
2021-06-22 20:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 15:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2021-06-23 16:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/<driver>: drm_gem_plane_helper_prepare_fb is now " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 8:32 ` Philipp Zabel
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/15] drm/armada: Remove prepare/cleanup_fb hooks Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 12:46 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/15] drm/vram-helpers: Create DRM_GEM_VRAM_PLANE_HELPER_FUNCS Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 7:38 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 7:46 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-06-24 13:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/omap: Follow implicit fencing in prepare_fb Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/simple-helper: drm_gem_simple_display_pipe_prepare_fb as default Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 19:15 ` Sam Ravnborg
2021-06-23 16:24 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 17:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/tiny: drm_gem_simple_display_pipe_prepare_fb is the default Daniel Vetter
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/gem: Tiny kernel clarification for drm_gem_fence_array_add Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 8:42 ` Christian König
2021-06-24 12:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 12:48 ` Christian König
2021-06-24 13:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 13:35 ` Christian König
2021-06-24 13:41 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24 13:45 ` Christian König
2021-06-22 16:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] RFC: drm/amdgpu: Implement a proper implicit fencing uapi Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 9:45 ` Bas Nieuwenhuizen
2021-06-23 12:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 12:59 ` Christian König
2021-06-23 13:38 ` Bas Nieuwenhuizen
2021-06-23 13:44 ` Christian König
2021-06-23 13:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 14:02 ` Christian König
2021-06-23 14:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 14:58 ` Bas Nieuwenhuizen
2021-06-23 15:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 15:07 ` Christian König
2021-06-23 15:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-23 15:15 ` Christian König
2021-06-22 17:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for implicit fencing/dma-resv rules for shared buffers Patchwork
2021-06-22 17:11 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-22 17:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-06-22 19:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-06-23 17:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for implicit fencing/dma-resv rules for shared buffers (rev5) Patchwork
2021-06-23 17:07 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-23 17:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-06-23 21:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210623185250.7418a744@collabora.com \
--to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).