intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/47] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 00:04:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210624070516.21893-12-matthew.brost@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624070516.21893-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>

Implement GuC submission tasklet for new interface. The new GuC
interface uses H2G to submit contexts to the GuC. Since H2G use a single
channel, a single tasklet submits is used for the submission path.

Also the per engine interrupt handler has been updated to disable the
rescheduling of the physical engine tasklet, when using GuC scheduling,
as the physical engine tasklet is no longer used.

In this patch the field, guc_id, has been added to intel_context and is
not assigned. Patches later in the series will assign this value.

Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h |   9 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h        |   4 +
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 231 +++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
index ed8c447a7346..bb6fef7eae52 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_types.h
@@ -136,6 +136,15 @@ struct intel_context {
 	struct intel_sseu sseu;
 
 	u8 wa_bb_page; /* if set, page num reserved for context workarounds */
+
+	/* GuC scheduling state that does not require a lock. */
+	atomic_t guc_sched_state_no_lock;
+
+	/*
+	 * GuC lrc descriptor ID - Not assigned in this patch but future patches
+	 * in the series will.
+	 */
+	u16 guc_id;
 };
 
 #endif /* __INTEL_CONTEXT_TYPES__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
index 2313d9fc087b..9ba8219475b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
@@ -30,6 +30,10 @@ struct intel_guc {
 	struct intel_guc_log log;
 	struct intel_guc_ct ct;
 
+	/* Global engine used to submit requests to GuC */
+	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine;
+	struct i915_request *stalled_request;
+
 	/* intel_guc_recv interrupt related state */
 	spinlock_t irq_lock;
 	unsigned int msg_enabled_mask;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index 23a94a896a0b..ee933efbf0ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -60,6 +60,31 @@
 
 #define GUC_REQUEST_SIZE 64 /* bytes */
 
+/*
+ * Below is a set of functions which control the GuC scheduling state which do
+ * not require a lock as all state transitions are mutually exclusive. i.e. It
+ * is not possible for the context pinning code and submission, for the same
+ * context, to be executing simultaneously. We still need an atomic as it is
+ * possible for some of the bits to changing at the same time though.
+ */
+#define SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED			BIT(0)
+static inline bool context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	return (atomic_read(&ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock) &
+		SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED);
+}
+
+static inline void set_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	atomic_or(SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED, &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void clr_context_enabled(struct intel_context *ce)
+{
+	atomic_and((u32)~SCHED_STATE_NO_LOCK_ENABLED,
+		   &ce->guc_sched_state_no_lock);
+}
+
 static inline struct i915_priolist *to_priolist(struct rb_node *rb)
 {
 	return rb_entry(rb, struct i915_priolist, node);
@@ -122,37 +147,29 @@ static inline void set_lrc_desc_registered(struct intel_guc *guc, u32 id,
 	xa_store_irq(&guc->context_lookup, id, ce, GFP_ATOMIC);
 }
 
-static void guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
+static int guc_add_request(struct intel_guc *guc, struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	/* Leaving stub as this function will be used in future patches */
-}
+	int err;
+	struct intel_context *ce = rq->context;
+	u32 action[3];
+	int len = 0;
+	bool enabled = context_enabled(ce);
 
-/*
- * When we're doing submissions using regular execlists backend, writing to
- * ELSP from CPU side is enough to make sure that writes to ringbuffer pages
- * pinned in mappable aperture portion of GGTT are visible to command streamer.
- * Writes done by GuC on our behalf are not guaranteeing such ordering,
- * therefore, to ensure the flush, we're issuing a POSTING READ.
- */
-static void flush_ggtt_writes(struct i915_vma *vma)
-{
-	if (i915_vma_is_map_and_fenceable(vma))
-		intel_uncore_posting_read_fw(vma->vm->gt->uncore,
-					     GUC_STATUS);
-}
+	if (!enabled) {
+		action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT_MODE_SET;
+		action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
+		action[len++] = GUC_CONTEXT_ENABLE;
+	} else {
+		action[len++] = INTEL_GUC_ACTION_SCHED_CONTEXT;
+		action[len++] = ce->guc_id;
+	}
 
-static void guc_submit(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
-		       struct i915_request **out,
-		       struct i915_request **end)
-{
-	struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
+	err = intel_guc_send_nb(guc, action, len);
 
-	do {
-		struct i915_request *rq = *out++;
+	if (!enabled && !err)
+		set_context_enabled(ce);
 
-		flush_ggtt_writes(rq->ring->vma);
-		guc_add_request(guc, rq);
-	} while (out != end);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
@@ -160,125 +177,88 @@ static inline int rq_prio(const struct i915_request *rq)
 	return rq->sched.attr.priority;
 }
 
-static struct i915_request *schedule_in(struct i915_request *rq, int idx)
+static int guc_dequeue_one_context(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
-	trace_i915_request_in(rq, idx);
-
-	/*
-	 * Currently we are not tracking the rq->context being inflight
-	 * (ce->inflight = rq->engine). It is only used by the execlists
-	 * backend at the moment, a similar counting strategy would be
-	 * required if we generalise the inflight tracking.
-	 */
-
-	__intel_gt_pm_get(rq->engine->gt);
-	return i915_request_get(rq);
-}
-
-static void schedule_out(struct i915_request *rq)
-{
-	trace_i915_request_out(rq);
-
-	intel_gt_pm_put_async(rq->engine->gt);
-	i915_request_put(rq);
-}
-
-static void __guc_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
-{
-	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
-	struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = engine->sched_engine;
-	struct i915_request **first = execlists->inflight;
-	struct i915_request ** const last_port = first + execlists->port_mask;
-	struct i915_request *last = first[0];
-	struct i915_request **port;
+	struct i915_sched_engine * const sched_engine = guc->sched_engine;
+	struct i915_request *last = NULL;
 	bool submit = false;
 	struct rb_node *rb;
+	int ret;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&sched_engine->lock);
 
-	if (last) {
-		if (*++first)
-			return;
-
-		last = NULL;
+	if (guc->stalled_request) {
+		submit = true;
+		last = guc->stalled_request;
+		goto resubmit;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * We write directly into the execlists->inflight queue and don't use
-	 * the execlists->pending queue, as we don't have a distinct switch
-	 * event.
-	 */
-	port = first;
 	while ((rb = rb_first_cached(&sched_engine->queue))) {
 		struct i915_priolist *p = to_priolist(rb);
 		struct i915_request *rq, *rn;
 
 		priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p) {
-			if (last && rq->context != last->context) {
-				if (port == last_port)
-					goto done;
-
-				*port = schedule_in(last,
-						    port - execlists->inflight);
-				port++;
-			}
+			if (last && rq->context != last->context)
+				goto done;
 
 			list_del_init(&rq->sched.link);
+
 			__i915_request_submit(rq);
-			submit = true;
+
+			trace_i915_request_in(rq, 0);
 			last = rq;
+			submit = true;
 		}
 
 		rb_erase_cached(&p->node, &sched_engine->queue);
 		i915_priolist_free(p);
 	}
 done:
-	sched_engine->queue_priority_hint =
-		rb ? to_priolist(rb)->priority : INT_MIN;
 	if (submit) {
-		*port = schedule_in(last, port - execlists->inflight);
-		*++port = NULL;
-		guc_submit(engine, first, port);
+		last->context->lrc_reg_state[CTX_RING_TAIL] =
+			intel_ring_set_tail(last->ring, last->tail);
+resubmit:
+		/*
+		 * We only check for -EBUSY here even though it is possible for
+		 * -EDEADLK to be returned. If -EDEADLK is returned, the GuC has
+		 * died and a full GPU needs to be done. The hangcheck will
+		 * eventually detect that the GuC has died and trigger this
+		 * reset so no need to handle -EDEADLK here.
+		 */
+		ret = guc_add_request(guc, last);
+		if (ret == -EBUSY) {
+			tasklet_schedule(&sched_engine->tasklet);
+			guc->stalled_request = last;
+			return false;
+		}
 	}
-	execlists->active = execlists->inflight;
+
+	guc->stalled_request = NULL;
+	return submit;
 }
 
 static void guc_submission_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
 {
 	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine =
 		from_tasklet(sched_engine, t, tasklet);
-	struct intel_engine_cs * const engine = sched_engine->private_data;
-	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
-	struct i915_request **port, *rq;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	bool loop;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
-
-	for (port = execlists->inflight; (rq = *port); port++) {
-		if (!i915_request_completed(rq))
-			break;
-
-		schedule_out(rq);
-	}
-	if (port != execlists->inflight) {
-		int idx = port - execlists->inflight;
-		int rem = ARRAY_SIZE(execlists->inflight) - idx;
-		memmove(execlists->inflight, port, rem * sizeof(*port));
-	}
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 
-	__guc_dequeue(engine);
+	do {
+		loop = guc_dequeue_one_context(sched_engine->private_data);
+	} while (loop);
 
-	i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(engine->sched_engine);
+	i915_sched_engine_reset_on_empty(sched_engine);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void cs_irq_handler(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u16 iir)
 {
-	if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT) {
+	if (iir & GT_RENDER_USER_INTERRUPT)
 		intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(engine);
-		tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet);
-	}
 }
 
 static void guc_reset_prepare(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -349,6 +329,10 @@ static void guc_reset_cancel(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	struct rb_node *rb;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	/* Can be called during boot if GuC fails to load */
+	if (!engine->gt)
+		return;
+
 	ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "\n");
 
 	/*
@@ -433,8 +417,11 @@ int intel_guc_submission_init(struct intel_guc *guc)
 
 void intel_guc_submission_fini(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
-	if (guc->lrc_desc_pool)
-		guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
+	if (!guc->lrc_desc_pool)
+		return;
+
+	guc_lrc_desc_pool_destroy(guc);
+	i915_sched_engine_put(guc->sched_engine);
 }
 
 static int guc_context_alloc(struct intel_context *ce)
@@ -499,32 +486,32 @@ static int guc_request_alloc(struct i915_request *request)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void queue_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
 				 struct i915_request *rq,
 				 int prio)
 {
 	GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
 	list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
-		      i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine->sched_engine, prio));
+		      i915_sched_lookup_priolist(sched_engine, prio));
 	set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
 }
 
 static void guc_submit_request(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
-	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine;
+	struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine = rq->engine->sched_engine;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign fences. */
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 
-	queue_request(engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
+	queue_request(sched_engine, rq, rq_prio(rq));
 
-	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(engine->sched_engine));
+	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_sched_engine_is_empty(sched_engine));
 	GEM_BUG_ON(list_empty(&rq->sched.link));
 
-	tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet);
+	tasklet_hi_schedule(&sched_engine->tasklet);
 
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->sched_engine->lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_engine->lock, flags);
 }
 
 static void sanitize_hwsp(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
@@ -602,8 +589,6 @@ static void guc_release(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	engine->sanitize = NULL; /* no longer in control, nothing to sanitize */
 
-	tasklet_kill(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet);
-
 	intel_engine_cleanup_common(engine);
 	lrc_fini_wa_ctx(engine);
 }
@@ -674,6 +659,7 @@ static inline void guc_default_irqs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
+	struct intel_guc *guc = &engine->gt->uc.guc;
 
 	/*
 	 * The setup relies on several assumptions (e.g. irqs always enabled)
@@ -681,7 +667,18 @@ int intel_guc_submission_setup(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	 */
 	GEM_BUG_ON(GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 11);
 
-	tasklet_setup(&engine->sched_engine->tasklet, guc_submission_tasklet);
+	if (!guc->sched_engine) {
+		guc->sched_engine = i915_sched_engine_create(ENGINE_VIRTUAL);
+		if (!guc->sched_engine)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		guc->sched_engine->schedule = i915_schedule;
+		guc->sched_engine->private_data = guc;
+		tasklet_setup(&guc->sched_engine->tasklet,
+			      guc_submission_tasklet);
+	}
+	i915_sched_engine_put(engine->sched_engine);
+	engine->sched_engine = i915_sched_engine_get(guc->sched_engine);
 
 	guc_default_vfuncs(engine);
 	guc_default_irqs(engine);
-- 
2.28.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-24  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 170+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24  7:04 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/47] GuC submission support Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/47] drm/i915/guc: Relax CTB response timeout Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:23   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/47] drm/i915/guc: Improve error message for unsolicited CT response Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 11:58   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/47] drm/i915/guc: Increase size of CTB buffers Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 13:49   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 15:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 12:03       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/47] drm/i915/guc: Add non blocking CTB send function Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 14:48   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 15:49     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:02       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 22:41         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 11:50           ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 17:53             ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 22:47         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/47] drm/i915/guc: Add stall timer to " Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 17:37   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-24 23:01     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/47] drm/i915/guc: Optimize CTB writes and reads Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:09   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 18:26     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 20:28     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/47] drm/i915/guc: Module load failure test for CT buffer creation Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/47] drm/i915/guc: Add new GuC interface defines and structures Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 21:11   ` John Harrison
2021-06-30  0:30     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/47] drm/i915/guc: Remove GuC stage descriptor, add lrc descriptor Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 19:44   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/47] drm/i915/guc: Add lrc descriptor context lookup array Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:17   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 17:26     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 21:20       ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-06-29 22:04   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/47] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC submission tasklet John Harrison
2021-06-30  0:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/47] drm/i915/guc: Add bypass tasklet submission path to GuC Matthew Brost
2021-06-29 22:09   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/47] drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 13:25   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-25 17:46     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/47] drm/i915/guc: Insert fence on context when deregistering Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:39   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/47] drm/i915/guc: Defer context unpin until scheduling is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:48   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable engine barriers with GuC during unpin Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:53   ` John Harrison
2021-07-10  3:00     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 17:57       ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 18:11         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/47] drm/i915/guc: Extend deregistration fence to schedule disable Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 22:59   ` John Harrison
2021-07-10  3:36     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 17:54       ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/47] drm/i915: Disable preempt busywait when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 23:03   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/47] drm/i915/guc: Ensure request ordering via completion fences Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  1:51   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable semaphores when using GuC scheduling Matthew Brost
2021-07-09 23:53   ` John Harrison
2021-07-15  0:07     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/47] drm/i915/guc: Ensure G2H response has space in buffer Matthew Brost
2021-07-13 18:36   ` John Harrison
2021-07-15  0:06     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:12       ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/47] drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-07-10  0:16   ` John Harrison
2021-07-10  3:55     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-17  4:09       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/47] drm/i915/guc: Update GuC debugfs to support new GuC Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:05   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:37       ` John Harrison
2021-07-13  8:51   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-14 23:56     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/47] drm/i915/guc: Add several request trace points Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:08   ` John Harrison
2021-07-13  9:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-20  1:59     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-22 13:55       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/47] drm/i915: Add intel_context tracing Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:10   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 21:47     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:51       ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/47] drm/i915/guc: GuC virtual engines Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  1:21   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/47] drm/i915: Track 'serial' counts for " Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:11   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:06     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/47] drm/i915: Hold reference to intel_context over life of i915_request Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:23   ` John Harrison
2021-07-12 20:05     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:36       ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 21:48         ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/47] drm/i915/guc: Disable bonding extension with GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 18:23   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/47] drm/i915/guc: Direct all breadcrumbs for a class to single breadcrumbs Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 19:19   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/47] drm/i915/guc: Reset implementation for new GuC interface Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 19:58   ` John Harrison
2021-07-15  0:53     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  9:36   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-26 22:48     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-27  8:56       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-27 18:30         ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/47] drm/i915: Reset GPU immediately if submission is disabled Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:01   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/47] drm/i915/guc: Add disable interrupts to guc sanitize Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 20:11   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/47] drm/i915/guc: Suspend/resume implementation for new interface Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:56   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/47] drm/i915/guc: Handle context reset notification Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:58   ` John Harrison
2021-07-15  0:32     ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/47] drm/i915/guc: Handle engine reset failure notification Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 22:59   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/47] drm/i915/guc: Enable the timer expired interrupt for GuC Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 23:00   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/47] drm/i915/guc: Provide mmio list to be saved/restored on engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/47] drm/i915/guc: Don't complain about reset races Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 15:55   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/47] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC engine reset Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:19   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/47] drm/i915/guc: Capture error state on context reset Matthew Brost
2021-07-12 23:05   ` John Harrison
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/47] drm/i915/guc: Fix for error capture after full GPU reset with GuC Matthew Brost
2021-07-15  0:43   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/47] drm/i915/guc: Hook GuC scheduling policies up Matthew Brost
2021-06-25  0:59   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-25 19:10     ` John Harrison
2021-07-10 18:56       ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/47] drm/i915/guc: Connect reset modparam updates to GuC policy flags Matthew Brost
2021-06-25  1:10   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 45/47] drm/i915/guc: Include scheduling policies in the debugfs state dump Matthew Brost
2021-06-24 16:34   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 46/47] drm/i915/guc: Add golden context to GuC ADS Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:05 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 47/47] drm/i915/guc: Unblock GuC submission on Gen11+ Matthew Brost
2021-06-30  8:22   ` Martin Peres
2021-06-30 18:00     ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-01 18:24       ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02  8:13         ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 13:06           ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-02 13:12             ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 14:08               ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-06-30 18:58     ` John Harrison
2021-07-01  8:14       ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-01 18:27         ` Martin Peres
2021-07-01 19:28           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-02  7:29             ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-02  8:09               ` Martin Peres
2021-07-02 15:07                 ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-03  8:21                   ` Martin Peres
2021-07-07  0:57                     ` John Harrison
2021-07-07  7:47                       ` Pekka Paalanen
2021-07-07 10:11                       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-15  0:49   ` Matthew Brost
2021-06-24  7:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for GuC submission support Patchwork
2021-06-24  7:19 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-24  7:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-12 19:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for GuC submission support (rev2) Patchwork
2021-10-22  9:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/47] GuC submission support Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-22 16:42   ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-25  9:37     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25 15:15       ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-26  8:59         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-26 15:43           ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-26 15:51           ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-27  9:21             ` Joonas Lahtinen
2021-10-25 17:06       ` John Harrison

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210624070516.21893-12-matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).