Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gt: nuke gen6_hw_id

[Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 10:25:59AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
>On 21/07/2021 00:20, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>This is only used by GRAPHICS_VER == 6 and GRAPHICS_VER == 7. All other
>>recent platforms do not depend on this field, so it doesn't make much
>>sense to keep it generic like that. Instead, just do a mapping from
>>engine class to HW ID in the single place that is needed.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>>---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c    | 6 ------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h | 8 --------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h              | 4 +++-
>>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>index 508221de411c..0a04e8d90e9e 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
>>@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
>>  #define MAX_MMIO_BASES 3
>>  struct engine_info {
>>-	u8 gen6_hw_id;
>>  	u8 class;
>>  	u8 instance;
>>  	/* mmio bases table *must* be sorted in reverse graphics_ver order */
>>@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ struct engine_info {
>>  static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
>>  	[RCS0] = {
>>-		.gen6_hw_id = RCS0_HW,
>>  		.class = RENDER_CLASS,
>>  		.instance = 0,
>>  		.mmio_bases = {
>>@@ -62,7 +60,6 @@ static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
>>  		},
>>  	},
>>  	[BCS0] = {
>>-		.gen6_hw_id = BCS0_HW,
>>  		.class = COPY_ENGINE_CLASS,
>>  		.instance = 0,
>>  		.mmio_bases = {
>>@@ -70,7 +67,6 @@ static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
>>  		},
>>  	},
>>  	[VCS0] = {
>>-		.gen6_hw_id = VCS0_HW,
>>  		.class = VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS,
>>  		.instance = 0,
>>  		.mmio_bases = {
>>@@ -102,7 +98,6 @@ static const struct engine_info intel_engines[] = {
>>  		},
>>  	},
>>  	[VECS0] = {
>>-		.gen6_hw_id = VECS0_HW,
>>  		.class = VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS,
>>  		.instance = 0,
>>  		.mmio_bases = {
>>@@ -290,7 +285,6 @@ static int intel_engine_setup(struct intel_gt *gt, enum intel_engine_id id)
>>  	engine->i915 = i915;
>>  	engine->gt = gt;
>>  	engine->uncore = gt->uncore;
>>-	engine->gen6_hw_id = info->gen6_hw_id;
>>  	guc_class = engine_class_to_guc_class(info->class);
>>  	engine->guc_id = MAKE_GUC_ID(guc_class, info->instance);
>>  	engine->mmio_base = __engine_mmio_base(i915, info->mmio_bases);
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
>>index 266422d8d1b1..64330bfb7641 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_types.h
>>@@ -28,13 +28,6 @@
>>  #include "intel_wakeref.h"
>>  #include "intel_workarounds_types.h"
>>-/* Legacy HW Engine ID */
>>-
>>-#define RCS0_HW		0
>>-#define VCS0_HW		1
>>-#define BCS0_HW		2
>>-#define VECS0_HW	3
>>-
>>  /* Gen11+ HW Engine class + instance */
>>  #define RENDER_CLASS		0
>>  #define VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS	1
>>@@ -268,7 +261,6 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
>>  	intel_engine_mask_t mask;
>>-	u8 gen6_hw_id;
>>  	u8 class;
>>  	u8 instance;
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>index 8750ffce9d61..d91386f4828e 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>>@@ -2572,7 +2572,9 @@ static inline bool i915_mmio_reg_valid(i915_reg_t reg)
>>  #define   ARB_MODE_BWGTLB_DISABLE (1 << 9)
>>  #define   ARB_MODE_SWIZZLE_BDW	(1 << 1)
>>  #define RENDER_HWS_PGA_GEN7	_MMIO(0x04080)
>>-#define RING_FAULT_REG(engine)	_MMIO(0x4094 + 0x100 * (engine)->gen6_hw_id)
>>+
>>+#define _GEN6_ENGINE_CLASS_TO_ID(class) _PICK((class), 0, 1, 3, 2)
>>+#define RING_FAULT_REG(engine)	_MMIO(0x4094 + 0x100 * _GEN6_ENGINE_CLASS_TO_ID((engine)->class))
>
>Makes sense to me.
>
>Maybe HW_ID and HW_CLASS in the macro name? Not sure.

I can do that... I think I avoided it because it makes the macro
very big. Anyway, this should be called in just one place, so it doesn't
matter much... I can add it.

>
>Only open I have is why the "Gen11+ HW Engine class + instance" 
>comment and now we would tie that, allegedly Gen11 concept, with 
>Gen6-7. Care to do some digging?

Not sure. This comes from 3d7b3039741d ("drm/i915: Move engine IDs out of i915_reg.h")
that I reviewed :-o

Cc'ing  Daniele. I don't see "class" as a Gen11+ thing. Is it just that
those numbers started to make sense for gen11?  Since

a) we are using the class even for GRAPHICS_VER < 11
b) the legacy HW IDs shouldn't be used anywhere else anymore


we could

1) move the legacy defines back to i915_reg.h
2) use them in the macro above (IMO would slightly improve the
readability of that _PICK() call)
3) Remove the "Gen11+" comment in the _CLASS macros to avoid
misunderstandings


Thoughts?

thanks
Lucas De Marchi



>
>Regards,
>
>Tvrtko
>
>>  #define GEN8_RING_FAULT_REG	_MMIO(0x4094)
>>  #define GEN12_RING_FAULT_REG	_MMIO(0xcec4)
>>  #define   GEN8_RING_FAULT_ENGINE_ID(x)	(((x) >> 12) & 0x7)
>>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx