From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: slab_blocks can be static
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 15:38:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210724073823.GA36834@4ba55c1fc0c2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210723192934.1004427-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c:13:19: warning: symbol 'slab_blocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
i915_buddy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c
index 045d00c43b4ca..7b274c51cac05 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_buddy.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
#include "i915_gem.h"
#include "i915_utils.h"
-struct kmem_cache *slab_blocks;
+static struct kmem_cache *slab_blocks;
static struct i915_buddy_block *i915_block_alloc(struct i915_buddy_mm *mm,
struct i915_buddy_block *parent,
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-24 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-23 19:29 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Check for nomodeset in i915_init() first Daniel Vetter
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: move i915_active slab to direct module init/exit Daniel Vetter
2021-07-26 15:24 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: move i915_buddy " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-24 7:38 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 7:38 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-07-26 15:26 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: move intel_context " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-24 11:45 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 11:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: slab_ce can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-26 8:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: move intel_context slab to direct module init/exit Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-26 15:30 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26 15:42 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26 16:08 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-26 16:20 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-26 16:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-26 18:17 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-27 10:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: move gem_context " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-24 14:50 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 14:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: slab_luts can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-26 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: move gem_context slab to direct module init/exit Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: move gem_objects " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-24 18:23 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 18:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: slab_objects can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-26 15:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: move gem_objects slab to direct module init/exit Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: move request slabs " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-24 21:58 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-24 21:58 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: slab_requests can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-26 15:46 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: move request slabs to direct module init/exit Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: move scheduler " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-25 1:23 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-25 1:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: slab_dependencies can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-26 15:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: move scheduler slabs to direct module init/exit Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: move vma slab " Daniel Vetter
2021-07-25 4:04 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-25 4:04 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: slab_vmas can be static kernel test robot
2021-07-26 15:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: move vma slab to direct module init/exit Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-23 19:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Remove i915_globals Daniel Vetter
2021-07-26 15:51 ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-07-27 11:34 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-07-23 21:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Check for nomodeset in i915_init() first Patchwork
2021-07-23 21:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-23 22:29 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-24 9:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-07-26 15:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] " Jason Ekstrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210724073823.GA36834@4ba55c1fc0c2 \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).