From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Intel-gfx] [CI 22/28] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:18:39 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20210727071845.841554-22-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210727071845.841554-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> With the removal of CNL, let's consider ICL as the first platform using those constants. Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 24 +++++++++++------------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c | 32 +++++++++++++++---------------- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 36bde25426bd..e2a373784d5b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -11109,18 +11109,18 @@ enum skl_power_gate { #define SKL_DRAM_RANK_1 (0x0 << 10) #define SKL_DRAM_RANK_2 (0x1 << 10) #define SKL_DRAM_RANK_MASK (0x1 << 10) -#define CNL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK 0x7F -#define CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK (0x3 << 7) -#define CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT 7 -#define CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8 (0x0 << 7) -#define CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16 (0x1 << 7) -#define CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32 (0x2 << 7) -#define CNL_DRAM_RANK_MASK (0x3 << 9) -#define CNL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT 9 -#define CNL_DRAM_RANK_1 (0x0 << 9) -#define CNL_DRAM_RANK_2 (0x1 << 9) -#define CNL_DRAM_RANK_3 (0x2 << 9) -#define CNL_DRAM_RANK_4 (0x3 << 9) +#define ICL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK 0x7F +#define ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK (0x3 << 7) +#define ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT 7 +#define ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8 (0x0 << 7) +#define ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16 (0x1 << 7) +#define ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32 (0x2 << 7) +#define ICL_DRAM_RANK_MASK (0x3 << 9) +#define ICL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT 9 +#define ICL_DRAM_RANK_1 (0x0 << 9) +#define ICL_DRAM_RANK_2 (0x1 << 9) +#define ICL_DRAM_RANK_3 (0x2 << 9) +#define ICL_DRAM_RANK_4 (0x3 << 9) #define SA_PERF_STATUS_0_0_0_MCHBAR_PC _MMIO(MCHBAR_MIRROR_BASE_SNB + 0x5918) #define DG1_QCLK_RATIO_MASK REG_GENMASK(9, 2) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c index 9675bb94b70b..34d6cf440352 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c @@ -77,21 +77,21 @@ static int skl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val) } /* Returns total Gb for the whole DIMM */ -static int cnl_get_dimm_size(u16 val) +static int icl_get_dimm_size(u16 val) { - return (val & CNL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK) * 8 / 2; + return (val & ICL_DRAM_SIZE_MASK) * 8 / 2; } -static int cnl_get_dimm_width(u16 val) +static int icl_get_dimm_width(u16 val) { - if (cnl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0) + if (icl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0) return 0; - switch (val & CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) { - case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8: - case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16: - case CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32: - val = (val & CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) >> CNL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT; + switch (val & ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) { + case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X8: + case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X16: + case ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_X32: + val = (val & ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_MASK) >> ICL_DRAM_WIDTH_SHIFT; return 8 << val; default: MISSING_CASE(val); @@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ static int cnl_get_dimm_width(u16 val) } } -static int cnl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val) +static int icl_get_dimm_ranks(u16 val) { - if (cnl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0) + if (icl_get_dimm_size(val) == 0) return 0; - val = (val & CNL_DRAM_RANK_MASK) >> CNL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT; + val = (val & ICL_DRAM_RANK_MASK) >> ICL_DRAM_RANK_SHIFT; return val + 1; } @@ -121,10 +121,10 @@ skl_dram_get_dimm_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct dram_dimm_info *dimm, int channel, char dimm_name, u16 val) { - if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 10) { - dimm->size = cnl_get_dimm_size(val); - dimm->width = cnl_get_dimm_width(val); - dimm->ranks = cnl_get_dimm_ranks(val); + if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) >= 11) { + dimm->size = icl_get_dimm_size(val); + dimm->width = icl_get_dimm_width(val); + dimm->ranks = icl_get_dimm_ranks(val); } else { dimm->size = skl_get_dimm_size(val); dimm->width = skl_get_dimm_width(val); -- 2.31.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-27 7:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-27 7:18 [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 02/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 03/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 04/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 05/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 06/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 07/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 08/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 09/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 10/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 11/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 12/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 13/28] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 14/28] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 15/28] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 16/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 17/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 18/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_mocs.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 19/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 20/28] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 21/28] drm/i915/gt: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_sseu.c Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message] 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 23/28] drm/i915/gt: rename CNL references in intel_engine.h Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 24/28] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 25/28] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 26/28] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 27/28] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:18 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 28/28] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 16:45 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2.1] " Lucas De Marchi 2021-07-27 7:34 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Patchwork 2021-07-27 7:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-07-27 8:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-07-27 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork 2021-07-27 17:49 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [CI,01/28] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL (rev2) Patchwork 2021-07-27 17:51 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork 2021-07-27 18:18 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork 2021-07-28 3:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20210727071845.841554-22-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \ --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \ --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \ --subject='Re: [Intel-gfx] [CI 22/28] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).