From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from skl_universal_plane.c
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:59:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210728215946.1573015-13-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728215946.1573015-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
The only real platform with DISPLAY_VER == 10 is GLK. We don't need to
handle CNL explicitly in skl_universal_plane.c.
Remove code and rename functions/macros accordingly to use ICL prefix.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
index 3ad04bf2a0fd..0f40f8b07724 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c
@@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static u32 skl_plane_ctl_rotate(unsigned int rotate)
return 0;
}
-static u32 cnl_plane_ctl_flip(unsigned int reflect)
+static u32 icl_plane_ctl_flip(unsigned int reflect)
{
switch (reflect) {
case 0:
@@ -917,8 +917,8 @@ static u32 skl_plane_ctl(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
plane_ctl |= skl_plane_ctl_tiling(fb->modifier);
plane_ctl |= skl_plane_ctl_rotate(rotation & DRM_MODE_ROTATE_MASK);
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
- plane_ctl |= cnl_plane_ctl_flip(rotation &
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
+ plane_ctl |= icl_plane_ctl_flip(rotation &
DRM_MODE_REFLECT_MASK);
if (key->flags & I915_SET_COLORKEY_DESTINATION)
@@ -1828,7 +1828,7 @@ static bool skl_plane_has_ccs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (plane_id == PLANE_CURSOR)
return false;
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
return true;
if (IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
@@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ skl_universal_plane_create(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 | DRM_MODE_ROTATE_90 |
DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 | DRM_MODE_ROTATE_270;
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
supported_rotations |= DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X;
drm_plane_create_rotation_property(&plane->base,
@@ -2174,7 +2174,7 @@ skl_universal_plane_create(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
drm_plane_enable_fb_damage_clips(&plane->base);
- if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv))
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
drm_plane_create_scaling_filter_property(&plane->base,
BIT(DRM_SCALING_FILTER_DEFAULT) |
BIT(DRM_SCALING_FILTER_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR));
@@ -2295,7 +2295,7 @@ skl_get_initial_plane_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
break;
}
- if ((DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv)) && val & PLANE_CTL_FLIP_HORIZONTAL)
+ if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11 && val & PLANE_CTL_FLIP_HORIZONTAL)
plane_config->rotation |= DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X;
/* 90/270 degree rotation would require extra work */
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-28 21:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/25] Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/25] drm/i915/display: remove PORT_F workaround for CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_cdclk.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_color.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_combo_phy.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_crtc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_ddi.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_debugfs.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dmc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dp.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_dpll_mgr.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 23:39 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1 " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_vdsc.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/25] drm/i915/display: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_display_power.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/25] drm/i915/display: remove CNL ddi buf translation tables Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 16:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1.1 " Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/25] drm/i915/display: rename CNL references in skl_scaler.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from i915_irq.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_pch.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/25] drm/i915: remove explicit CNL handling from intel_wopcm.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/25] drm/i915: rename CNL references in intel_dram.c Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/25] drm/i915: replace random CNL comments Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/25] drm/i915: switch num_scalers/num_sprites to consider DISPLAY_VER Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/25] drm/i915: remove GRAPHICS_VER == 10 Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/25] drm/i915: rename/remove CNL registers Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-28 21:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/25] drm/i915: finish removal of CNL Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 0:32 ` Lucas De Marchi
2021-07-29 21:56 ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2021-07-28 23:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next Patchwork
2021-07-29 20:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-30 0:01 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Remove CNL - for drm-intel-next (rev3) Patchwork
2021-07-30 0:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-30 10:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210728215946.1573015-13-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).