intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:40:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729234051.GA58031@DUT151-ICLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728211144.15322-14-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 02:11:43PM -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
> Tests that exercise the SLPC get/set frequency interfaces.
> 
> Clamp_max will set max frequency to multiple levels and check
> that SLPC requests frequency lower than or equal to it.
> 
> Clamp_min will set min frequency to different levels and check
> if SLPC requests are higher or equal to those levels.
> 
> v2: Address review comments (Michal W)
> v3: Checkpatch() corrections
> v4: Remove unnecessary header file (Matthew Brost)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

Overall looks but need to address the checkpatch warnings, have question
/ nit below.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c           |   1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c       | 309 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h  |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 311 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> index 49db8ed9f80d..7a2aa0031cf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
> @@ -2330,4 +2330,5 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_gpu_turbo_disable);
>  
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
>  #include "selftest_rps.c"
> +#include "selftest_slpc.c"
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..119d012d1e1e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_slpc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2021 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#define NUM_STEPS 5
> +#define H2G_DELAY 50000
> +#define delay_for_h2g() usleep_range(H2G_DELAY, H2G_DELAY + 10000)
> +
> +static int slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, freq);
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_err("Could not set min frequency to [%u]\n", freq);
> +	else /* Delay to ensure h2g completes */
> +		delay_for_h2g();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, freq);
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_err("Could not set maximum frequency [%u]\n",
> +			freq);
> +	else /* Delay to ensure h2g completes */
> +		delay_for_h2g();
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int live_slpc_clamp_min(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = &i915->gt;
> +	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = &gt->uc.guc.slpc;
> +	struct intel_rps *rps = &gt->rps;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	enum intel_engine_id id;
> +	struct igt_spinner spin;
> +	u32 slpc_min_freq, slpc_max_freq;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(&gt->uc))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (igt_spinner_init(&spin, gt))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(slpc, &slpc_max_freq)) {
> +		pr_err("Could not get SLPC max freq\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(slpc, &slpc_min_freq)) {
> +		pr_err("Could not get SLPC min freq\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (slpc_min_freq == slpc_max_freq) {
> +		pr_err("Min/Max are fused to the same value\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
> +	intel_gt_pm_get(gt);
> +	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> +		struct i915_request *rq;
> +		u32 step, min_freq, req_freq;
> +		u32 act_freq, max_act_freq;
> +
> +		if (!intel_engine_can_store_dword(engine))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* Go from min to max in 5 steps */
> +		step = (slpc_max_freq - slpc_min_freq) / NUM_STEPS;
> +		max_act_freq = slpc_min_freq;
> +		for (min_freq = slpc_min_freq; min_freq < slpc_max_freq;
> +					min_freq += step) {
> +			err = slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, min_freq);
> +			if (err)
> +				break;
> +
> +			st_engine_heartbeat_disable(engine);
> +
> +			rq = igt_spinner_create_request(&spin,
> +					engine->kernel_context,
> +					MI_NOOP);
> +			if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> +				err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> +				st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			i915_request_add(rq);
> +
> +			if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&spin, rq)) {
> +				pr_err("%s: Spinner did not start\n",
> +					engine->name);
> +				igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +				st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +				intel_gt_set_wedged(engine->gt);
> +				err = -EIO;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			/* Wait for GuC to detect business and raise
> +			 * requested frequency if necessary.
> +			 */
> +			delay_for_h2g();
> +
> +			req_freq = intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(rps);
> +
> +			/* GuC requests freq in multiples of 50/3 MHz */

Where is this magic value (50/3) derived from? Is it subject to change
on future platforms / GuC firmwares?

Regardless of the answers above, use a define for this too.

Matt

> +			if (req_freq < (min_freq - 50/3)) {
> +				pr_err("SWReq is %d, should be at least %d\n", req_freq,
> +					min_freq - 50/3);
> +				igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +				st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +				err = -EINVAL;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			act_freq =  intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(rps);
> +			if (act_freq > max_act_freq)
> +				max_act_freq = act_freq;
> +
> +			igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +			st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +		}
> +
> +		pr_info("Max actual frequency for %s was %d\n",
> +				engine->name, max_act_freq);
> +
> +		/* Actual frequency should rise above min */
> +		if (max_act_freq == slpc_min_freq) {
> +			pr_err("Actual freq did not rise above min\n");
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Restore min/max frequencies */
> +	slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, slpc_max_freq);
> +	slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, slpc_min_freq);
> +
> +	if (igt_flush_test(gt->i915))
> +		err = -EIO;
> +
> +	intel_gt_pm_put(gt);
> +	igt_spinner_fini(&spin);
> +	intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +int live_slpc_clamp_max(void *arg)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> +	struct intel_gt *gt = &i915->gt;
> +	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
> +	struct intel_rps *rps;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
> +	enum intel_engine_id id;
> +	struct igt_spinner spin;
> +	int err = 0;
> +	u32 slpc_min_freq, slpc_max_freq;
> +
> +	slpc = &gt->uc.guc.slpc;
> +	rps = &gt->rps;
> +
> +	if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_slpc(&gt->uc))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (igt_spinner_init(&spin, gt))
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(slpc, &slpc_max_freq)) {
> +		pr_err("Could not get SLPC max freq\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(slpc, &slpc_min_freq)) {
> +		pr_err("Could not get SLPC min freq\n");
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (slpc_min_freq == slpc_max_freq) {
> +		pr_err("Min/Max are fused to the same value\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
> +	intel_gt_pm_get(gt);
> +	for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
> +		struct i915_request *rq;
> +		u32 max_freq, req_freq;
> +		u32 act_freq, max_act_freq;
> +		u32 step;
> +
> +		if (!intel_engine_can_store_dword(engine))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* Go from max to min in 5 steps */
> +		step = (slpc_max_freq - slpc_min_freq) / NUM_STEPS;
> +		max_act_freq = slpc_min_freq;
> +		for (max_freq = slpc_max_freq; max_freq > slpc_min_freq;
> +					max_freq -= step) {
> +			err = slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, max_freq);
> +			if (err)
> +				break;
> +
> +			st_engine_heartbeat_disable(engine);
> +
> +			rq = igt_spinner_create_request(&spin,
> +						engine->kernel_context,
> +						MI_NOOP);
> +			if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
> +				st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +				err = PTR_ERR(rq);
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			i915_request_add(rq);
> +
> +			if (!igt_wait_for_spinner(&spin, rq)) {
> +				pr_err("%s: SLPC spinner did not start\n",
> +				       engine->name);
> +				igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +				st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +				intel_gt_set_wedged(engine->gt);
> +				err = -EIO;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			delay_for_h2g();
> +
> +			/* Verify that SWREQ indeed was set to specific value */
> +			req_freq = intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(rps);
> +
> +			/* GuC requests freq in multiples of 50/3 MHz */
> +			if (req_freq > (max_freq + 50/3)) {
> +				pr_err("SWReq is %d, should be at most %d\n", req_freq,
> +					max_freq + 50/3);
> +				igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +				st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +				err = -EINVAL;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +
> +			act_freq =  intel_rps_read_actual_frequency(rps);
> +			if (act_freq > max_act_freq)
> +				max_act_freq = act_freq;
> +
> +			st_engine_heartbeat_enable(engine);
> +			igt_spinner_end(&spin);
> +
> +			if (err)
> +				break;
> +		}
> +
> +		pr_info("Max actual frequency for %s was %d\n",
> +				engine->name, max_act_freq);
> +
> +		/* Actual frequency should rise above min */
> +		if (max_act_freq == slpc_min_freq) {
> +			pr_err("Actual freq did not rise above min\n");
> +			err = -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (igt_flush_test(gt->i915)) {
> +			err = -EIO;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (err)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Restore min/max freq */
> +	slpc_set_max_freq(slpc, slpc_max_freq);
> +	slpc_set_min_freq(slpc, slpc_min_freq);
> +
> +	intel_gt_pm_put(gt);
> +	igt_spinner_fini(&spin);
> +	intel_gt_pm_wait_for_idle(gt);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +int intel_slpc_live_selftests(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
> +		SUBTEST(live_slpc_clamp_max),
> +		SUBTEST(live_slpc_clamp_min),
> +	};
> +
> +	if (intel_gt_is_wedged(&i915->gt))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return i915_live_subtests(tests, i915);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> index e2fd1b61af71..1746a56dda06 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_live_selftests.h
> @@ -47,5 +47,6 @@ selftest(hangcheck, intel_hangcheck_live_selftests)
>  selftest(execlists, intel_execlists_live_selftests)
>  selftest(ring_submission, intel_ring_submission_live_selftests)
>  selftest(perf, i915_perf_live_selftests)
> +selftest(slpc, intel_slpc_live_selftests)
>  /* Here be dragons: keep last to run last! */
>  selftest(late_gt_pm, intel_gt_pm_late_selftests)
> -- 
> 2.25.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-29 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-28 21:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 00/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Initial definitions for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-29 15:28   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Gate Host RPS when SLPC is enabled Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Adding SLPC communication interfaces Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-29 15:33   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allocate, initialize and release SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable SLPC and add related H2G events Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-29 15:48   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Remove BUG_ON in guc_submission_disable Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add methods to set min/max frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-29 16:33   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add get max/min freq hooks Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add debugfs for SLPC info Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable ARAT timer interrupt Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Cache platform frequency limits Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-29 16:21   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-29 17:24     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Sysfs hooks for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-29 20:28   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-29 23:40   ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-07-30  1:12     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-07-30  1:45   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-28 21:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/guc/rc: Setup and enable GuCRC feature Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-28 22:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features (rev2) Patchwork
2021-07-28 22:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-28 23:21 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-29  4:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-30 20:21 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 00/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30 20:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:00 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 00/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30  2:01 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-30 19:55   ` Matthew Brost
2021-07-21 16:11 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/14] drm/i915/guc: Enable GuC based power management features Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-07-21 16:11 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest Vinay Belgaumkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210729234051.GA58031@DUT151-ICLU.fm.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add SLPC selftest' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).