intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 19:37:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210809193739.GA124301@DUT151-ICLU.fm.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YREv3mwWxH6cN9I7@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 03:38:38PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 11:07:56AM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > GuC submission has exposed an existing memory corruption in
> > live_lrc_isolation. We believe that some writes to the watchdog offsets
> > in the LRC (0x178 & 0x17c) can result in trashing of portions of the
> > address space. With GuC submission there are additional objects which
> > can move the context redzone into the space that is trashed. To
> > workaround this avoid poisoning the watchdog.
> 
> A Bspec reference here would be good (we can quote anything that's marked
> for public release, so doesn't have one of the IP markers).
>

Let me see what I dig up in the bspec.

BTW - Hopefully we can root cause this soon with a proper fix.
 
> Also I think the above should be replicated in condensed form instead of
> the XXX comment.
>

Sure.

Matt

> With those: Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> since I
> definitely have enough clue here for a detailed review.
> -Daniel
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > index b0977a3b699b..6500e9fce8a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> > @@ -1074,6 +1074,32 @@ record_registers(struct intel_context *ce,
> >  	goto err_after;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static u32 safe_offset(u32 offset, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > +	/* XXX skip testing of watchdog */
> > +	if (offset == 0x178 || offset == 0x17c)
> > +		reg = 0;
> > +
> > +	return reg;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int get_offset_mask(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> > +{
> > +	if (GRAPHICS_VER(engine->i915) < 12)
> > +		return 0xfff;
> > +
> > +	switch (engine->class) {
> > +	default:
> > +	case RENDER_CLASS:
> > +		return 0x07ff;
> > +	case COPY_ENGINE_CLASS:
> > +		return 0x0fff;
> > +	case VIDEO_DECODE_CLASS:
> > +	case VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS:
> > +		return 0x3fff;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct i915_vma *load_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 poison)
> >  {
> >  	struct i915_vma *batch;
> > @@ -1117,7 +1143,8 @@ static struct i915_vma *load_context(struct intel_context *ce, u32 poison)
> >  		len = (len + 1) / 2;
> >  		*cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(len);
> >  		while (len--) {
> > -			*cs++ = hw[dw];
> > +			*cs++ = safe_offset(hw[dw] & get_offset_mask(ce->engine),
> > +					    hw[dw]);
> >  			*cs++ = poison;
> >  			dw += 2;
> >  		}
> > -- 
> > 2.28.0
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-09 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-08 18:07 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Clean up some CI failures for GuC submission Matthew Brost
2021-08-08 17:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2021-08-08 18:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc: Fix several issues related to resets / request cancelation Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 13:35   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:35     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 10:32       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-08 18:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/selftests: Fix memory corruption in live_lrc_isolation Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 13:38   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:37     ` Matthew Brost [this message]
2021-08-10 10:33       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-08 18:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Matthew Brost
2021-08-09 14:03   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-09 19:41     ` Matthew Brost
2021-08-10 10:36       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-08-08 18:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Clean up some CI failures for GuC submission Patchwork
2021-08-08 19:40 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210809193739.GA124301@DUT151-ICLU.fm.intel.com \
    --to=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).