From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com,
matthew.brost@intel.com
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 08/25] drm/i915/guc: Kick tasklet after queuing a request
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:50:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210902005022.711767-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210902005022.711767-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
From: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Kick tasklet after queuing a request so it submitted in a timely manner.
Fixes: 3a4cdf1982f0 ("drm/i915/guc: Implement GuC context operations for new inteface")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index f9e3725b94c1..bd401a5be87c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -1049,6 +1049,7 @@ static inline void queue_request(struct i915_sched_engine *sched_engine,
list_add_tail(&rq->sched.link,
i915_sched_lookup_priolist(sched_engine, prio));
set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &rq->fence.flags);
+ tasklet_hi_schedule(&sched_engine->tasklet);
}
static int guc_bypass_tasklet_submit(struct intel_guc *guc,
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-02 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 0:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 00/25] Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 01/25] drm/i915/guc: Fix blocked context accounting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 02/25] drm/i915/guc: Fix outstanding G2H accounting Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 22:11 ` John Harrison
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 03/25] drm/i915/guc: Unwind context requests in reverse order Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 04/25] drm/i915/guc: Don't drop ce->guc_active.lock when unwinding context Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 05/25] drm/i915/guc: Process all G2H message at once in work queue Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 06/25] drm/i915/guc: Workaround reset G2H is received after schedule done G2H Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 07/25] Revert "drm/i915/gt: Propagate change in error status to children on unhold" Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-03 23:49 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio [this message]
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 09/25] drm/i915/guc: Don't enable scheduling on a banned context, guc_id invalid, not registered Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 10/25] drm/i915/guc: Copy whole golden context, set engine state size of subset Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 19:25 ` John Harrison
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 11/25] drm/i915/selftests: Add initial GuC selftest for scrubbing lost G2H Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 12/25] drm/i915/guc: Take context ref when cancelling request Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 13/25] drm/i915/guc: Don't touch guc_state.sched_state without a lock Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 14/25] drm/i915/guc: Reset LRC descriptor if register returns -ENODEV Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 15/25] drm/i915: Allocate error capture in nowait context Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 16/25] drm/i915/guc: Flush G2H work queue during reset Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 17/25] drm/i915/guc: Release submit fence from an irq_work Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 18/25] drm/i915/guc: Move guc_blocked fence to struct guc_state Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 19/25] drm/i915/guc: Rework and simplify locking Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 20/25] drm/i915/guc: Proper xarray usage for contexts_lookup Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 21/25] drm/i915/guc: Drop pin count check trick between sched_disable and re-pin Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 22/25] drm/i915/guc: Move GuC priority fields in context under guc_active Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 23/25] drm/i915/guc: Move fields protected by guc->contexts_lock into sub structure Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 24/25] drm/i915/guc: Drop guc_active move everything into guc_state Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 0:50 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 25/25] drm/i915/guc: Add GuC kernel doc Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-02 17:01 ` John Harrison
2021-09-02 17:15 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-03 19:59 ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2021-09-08 23:38 ` John Harrison
2021-09-02 1:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev8) Patchwork
2021-09-02 1:05 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-02 1:32 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-09-02 2:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-09-03 20:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev9) Patchwork
2021-09-03 20:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-03 20:42 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-09-04 0:15 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Clean up GuC CI failures, simplify locking, and kernel DOC (rev10) Patchwork
2021-09-04 0:17 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-09-04 0:46 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210902005022.711767-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--to=daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).