From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35F7C6FD1D for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 12:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377210E2AA; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 12:03:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA7B10E2AA for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 12:03:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1680869019; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=RkUUy9iLyVeqXpHFSjwkEYxhFcB9vKBhzKxpfaiYE+o=; b=EZrVU8BFU76i+Cr77Hd1dnYto4hC6OWDZrZP+9CrB2D0GQ35/daKGO9LFcHrM+Ph/lfsdy ii5ZPUGulBHf4bdOu4XZQYfLMT+BVzotbbqLNR6uDdphoaeBvl3AAIM3IKNqt8GLxipL/p Fgy2lyG17huzBuagsoAqxRrPKZEYLgE= Received: from mail-io1-f71.google.com (mail-io1-f71.google.com [209.85.166.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-110-RuoHZO5eMfqqrR7R0-y3xg-1; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 08:03:38 -0400 X-MC-Unique: RuoHZO5eMfqqrR7R0-y3xg-1 Received: by mail-io1-f71.google.com with SMTP id d204-20020a6bb4d5000000b00758cfdd36c3so25799880iof.0 for ; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 05:03:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680869018; x=1683461018; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:organization:references :in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RkUUy9iLyVeqXpHFSjwkEYxhFcB9vKBhzKxpfaiYE+o=; b=u8AdpXrbbg/rgePBuxH1LsqVEmM2fHsQWym5tnIYw7C7NReK8cCjKIYM69HkXYtsWi bs9Z0/p3OrZWJyKKt3QWyA8i+8yhmY4Op4GNegnDbv9JEEZR2uHn/ywsk9vgm5z2uxGc N5ZEzxb0rvncJErjs9QCUzXnXZ8HW2pR/PRSplD9it+8jjmCKGCTuPqRio1XVWk4DYSd WtJrruxwCbXAXJtQ+hFDgfqfdy9OG6NxqjccINTAaqnOCqGenr0LvkM2MQbsQlRfFA/9 Tq9CYNhBswf0/OTe7yoDGDdpg6QQiSGdk51oeAD7Mq3HruPVk/O595u0Bhzzy5OqsLiI DkPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9d9KGqAIrY+XrOJ4HARw7NIhfYvrjb8OXA4Rzxgzey5D1l8w1Zv pIeRRv27yucLS/VWczId9d0SCCL9MaoPgERRegLFOo+npoIETAtldhoQBN/Wb1i++nH4yPYtsPG 7uDzZYvuvk2/Mn87Iu8/vADk6HBRR X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e809:0:b0:74c:aa8f:a83e with SMTP id f9-20020a6be809000000b0074caa8fa83emr1736941ioh.6.1680869017715; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 05:03:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350b47GhoP5h7PpNabOBHlWCa/K0lm8L4p8ItVOpFt9aS9p6DIyF0sceWV4C6aZBR6S4P0IdR1A== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e809:0:b0:74c:aa8f:a83e with SMTP id f9-20020a6be809000000b0074caa8fa83emr1736912ioh.6.1680869017415; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 05:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([38.15.36.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m42-20020a026d2a000000b003a4419ba0c2sm1027418jac.139.2023.04.07.05.03.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Apr 2023 05:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 06:03:35 -0600 From: Alex Williamson To: "Liu, Yi L" Message-ID: <20230407060335.7babfeb8.alex.williamson@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20230401144429.88673-1-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <20230401144429.88673-13-yi.l.liu@intel.com> <20230403090151.4cb2158c.alex.williamson@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/12] vfio/pci: Report dev_id in VFIO_DEVICE_GET_PCI_HOT_RESET_INFO X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "mjrosato@linux.ibm.com" , "jasowang@redhat.com" , "Hao, Xudong" , "peterx@redhat.com" , "Xu, Terrence" , "chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com" , "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "lulu@redhat.com" , "Jiang, Yanting" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "nicolinc@nvidia.com" , "jgg@nvidia.com" , "Zhao, Yan Y" , "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" , "eric.auger@redhat.com" , "intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" , "yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com" , "cohuck@redhat.com" , "shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com" , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , "robin.murphy@arm.com" Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 10:09:58 +0000 "Liu, Yi L" wrote: > Hi Alex, > > > From: Alex Williamson > > Sent: Monday, April 3, 2023 11:02 PM > > > > On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 09:25:06 +0000 > > "Liu, Yi L" wrote: > > > > > > From: Liu, Yi L > > > > Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 10:44 PM > > > > > > > @@ -791,7 +813,21 @@ static int vfio_pci_fill_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void > > *data) > > > > if (!iommu_group) > > > > return -EPERM; /* Cannot reset non-isolated devices */ > > > > > > Hi Alex, > > > > > > Is disabling iommu a sane way to test vfio noiommu mode? > > > > Yes > > > > > I added intel_iommu=off to disable intel iommu and bind a device to vfio-pci. > > > I can see the /dev/vfio/noiommu-0 and /dev/vfio/devices/noiommu-vfio0. Bind > > > iommufd==-1 can succeed, but failed to get hot reset info due to the above > > > group check. Reason is that this happens to have some affected devices, and > > > these devices have no valid iommu_group (because they are not bound to vfio-pci > > > hence nobody allocates noiommu group for them). So when hot reset info loops > > > such devices, it failed with -EPERM. Is this expected? > > > > Hmm, I didn't recall that we put in such a limitation, but given the > > minimally intrusive approach to no-iommu and the fact that we never > > defined an invalid group ID to return to the user, it makes sense that > > we just blocked the ioctl for no-iommu use. I guess we can do the same > > for no-iommu cdev. > > I just realize a further issue related to this limitation. Remember that we > may finally compile out the vfio group infrastructure in the future. Say I > want to test noiommu, I may boot such a kernel with iommu disabled. I think > the _INFO ioctl would fail as there is no iommu_group. Does it mean we will > not support hot reset for noiommu in future if vfio group infrastructure is > compiled out? We're talking about IOMMU groups, IOMMU groups are always present regardless of whether we expose a vfio group interface to userspace. Remember, we create IOMMU groups even in the no-iommu case. Even with pure cdev, there are underlying IOMMU groups that maintain the DMA ownership. > As another thread, we are going to add a new bdf/group capability to > DEVICE_GET_INFO. If the above kernel is booted, shall we exclude the new > bdf/group capability or add a flag in the capability to mark the group_id > is invalid? As above, there's always an IOMMU group, it's never invalid. Thanks, Alex