From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Larabel Subject: Re: reduced LLC caching series Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:35:37 -0500 Message-ID: <4D93B039.2030308@phoronix.com> References: <1301443195-10721-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from phx1.phoronix.com (173.192.77.202-static.reverse.softlayer.com [173.192.77.202]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581129E852 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:03:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1301443195-10721-1-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Eric & Chris, For those interested, here's some of my test results of the LLC caching patch-set compared to a vanilla 2.6.38 and 2.6.39-rc1 on two SNBs. They just show some nice gains across the board and I haven't hit any issues with the patches. Core i3 2100: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1103303-GR-INTELLCCC18&obr_ab=1 Core i5 2500K: http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1103303-GR-INTELLCCC27&obr_ab=1 -- Michael