intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/14] vfio/pci: Move to the device set infrastructure
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 21:49:17 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8-v3-6c9e19cc7d44+15613-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0-v3-6c9e19cc7d44+15613-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com>

From: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>

PCI wants to have the usual open/close_device() logic with the slight
twist that the open/close_device() must be done under a singelton lock
shared by all of the vfio_devices that are in the PCI "reset group".

The reset group, and thus the device set, is determined by what devices
pci_reset_bus() touches, which is either the entire bus or only the slot.

Rely on the core code to do everything reflck was doing and delete reflck
entirely.

Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c         | 162 +++++++---------------------
 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h |   7 --
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
index fab3715d60d4ba..5d6db93d6c680f 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
@@ -530,53 +530,40 @@ static void vfio_pci_vf_token_user_add(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, int val)
 	vfio_device_put(&pf_vdev->vdev);
 }
 
-static void vfio_pci_release(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
+static void vfio_pci_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
 {
 	struct vfio_pci_device *vdev =
 		container_of(core_vdev, struct vfio_pci_device, vdev);
 
-	mutex_lock(&vdev->reflck->lock);
-
-	if (!(--vdev->refcnt)) {
-		vfio_pci_vf_token_user_add(vdev, -1);
-		vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release(vdev->pdev);
-		vfio_pci_disable(vdev);
+	vfio_pci_vf_token_user_add(vdev, -1);
+	vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_release(vdev->pdev);
+	vfio_pci_disable(vdev);
 
-		mutex_lock(&vdev->igate);
-		if (vdev->err_trigger) {
-			eventfd_ctx_put(vdev->err_trigger);
-			vdev->err_trigger = NULL;
-		}
-		if (vdev->req_trigger) {
-			eventfd_ctx_put(vdev->req_trigger);
-			vdev->req_trigger = NULL;
-		}
-		mutex_unlock(&vdev->igate);
+	mutex_lock(&vdev->igate);
+	if (vdev->err_trigger) {
+		eventfd_ctx_put(vdev->err_trigger);
+		vdev->err_trigger = NULL;
 	}
-
-	mutex_unlock(&vdev->reflck->lock);
+	if (vdev->req_trigger) {
+		eventfd_ctx_put(vdev->req_trigger);
+		vdev->req_trigger = NULL;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&vdev->igate);
 }
 
-static int vfio_pci_open(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
+static int vfio_pci_open_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
 {
 	struct vfio_pci_device *vdev =
 		container_of(core_vdev, struct vfio_pci_device, vdev);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&vdev->reflck->lock);
-
-	if (!vdev->refcnt) {
-		ret = vfio_pci_enable(vdev);
-		if (ret)
-			goto error;
+	ret = vfio_pci_enable(vdev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
-		vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open(vdev->pdev);
-		vfio_pci_vf_token_user_add(vdev, 1);
-	}
-	vdev->refcnt++;
-error:
-	mutex_unlock(&vdev->reflck->lock);
-	return ret;
+	vfio_spapr_pci_eeh_open(vdev->pdev);
+	vfio_pci_vf_token_user_add(vdev, 1);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int vfio_pci_get_irq_count(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, int irq_type)
@@ -1870,8 +1857,8 @@ static int vfio_pci_match(struct vfio_device *core_vdev, char *buf)
 
 static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_pci_ops = {
 	.name		= "vfio-pci",
-	.open		= vfio_pci_open,
-	.release	= vfio_pci_release,
+	.open_device	= vfio_pci_open_device,
+	.close_device	= vfio_pci_close_device,
 	.ioctl		= vfio_pci_ioctl,
 	.read		= vfio_pci_read,
 	.write		= vfio_pci_write,
@@ -1880,9 +1867,6 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_pci_ops = {
 	.match		= vfio_pci_match,
 };
 
-static int vfio_pci_reflck_attach(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev);
-static void vfio_pci_reflck_put(struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck);
-
 static int vfio_pci_bus_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
 				 unsigned long action, void *data)
 {
@@ -2020,12 +2004,23 @@ static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->vma_list);
 	init_rwsem(&vdev->memory_lock);
 
-	ret = vfio_pci_reflck_attach(vdev);
+	if (pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus)) {
+		ret = vfio_assign_device_set(&vdev->vdev, vdev);
+	} else if (!pci_probe_reset_slot(pdev->slot)) {
+		ret = vfio_assign_device_set(&vdev->vdev, pdev->slot);
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * If there is no slot reset support for this device, the whole
+		 * bus needs to be grouped together to support bus-wide resets.
+		 */
+		ret = vfio_assign_device_set(&vdev->vdev, pdev->bus);
+	}
+
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_uninit;
 	ret = vfio_pci_vf_init(vdev);
 	if (ret)
-		goto out_reflck;
+		goto out_uninit;
 	ret = vfio_pci_vga_init(vdev);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out_vf;
@@ -2057,8 +2052,6 @@ static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 		vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
 out_vf:
 	vfio_pci_vf_uninit(vdev);
-out_reflck:
-	vfio_pci_reflck_put(vdev->reflck);
 out_uninit:
 	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
 	kfree(vdev->pm_save);
@@ -2077,7 +2070,6 @@ static void vfio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	vfio_unregister_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
 
 	vfio_pci_vf_uninit(vdev);
-	vfio_pci_reflck_put(vdev->reflck);
 	vfio_uninit_group_dev(&vdev->vdev);
 	vfio_pci_vga_uninit(vdev);
 
@@ -2153,86 +2145,6 @@ static struct pci_driver vfio_pci_driver = {
 	.err_handler		= &vfio_err_handlers,
 };
 
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(reflck_lock);
-
-static struct vfio_pci_reflck *vfio_pci_reflck_alloc(void)
-{
-	struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck;
-
-	reflck = kzalloc(sizeof(*reflck), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!reflck)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-
-	kref_init(&reflck->kref);
-	mutex_init(&reflck->lock);
-
-	return reflck;
-}
-
-static void vfio_pci_reflck_get(struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck)
-{
-	kref_get(&reflck->kref);
-}
-
-static int vfio_pci_reflck_find(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
-{
-	struct vfio_pci_reflck **preflck = data;
-	struct vfio_device *device;
-	struct vfio_pci_device *vdev;
-
-	device = vfio_device_get_from_dev(&pdev->dev);
-	if (!device)
-		return 0;
-
-	if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != &vfio_pci_driver) {
-		vfio_device_put(device);
-		return 0;
-	}
-
-	vdev = container_of(device, struct vfio_pci_device, vdev);
-
-	if (vdev->reflck) {
-		vfio_pci_reflck_get(vdev->reflck);
-		*preflck = vdev->reflck;
-		vfio_device_put(device);
-		return 1;
-	}
-
-	vfio_device_put(device);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int vfio_pci_reflck_attach(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
-{
-	bool slot = !pci_probe_reset_slot(vdev->pdev->slot);
-
-	mutex_lock(&reflck_lock);
-
-	if (pci_is_root_bus(vdev->pdev->bus) ||
-	    vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(vdev->pdev, vfio_pci_reflck_find,
-					  &vdev->reflck, slot) <= 0)
-		vdev->reflck = vfio_pci_reflck_alloc();
-
-	mutex_unlock(&reflck_lock);
-
-	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(vdev->reflck);
-}
-
-static void vfio_pci_reflck_release(struct kref *kref)
-{
-	struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck = container_of(kref,
-						      struct vfio_pci_reflck,
-						      kref);
-
-	kfree(reflck);
-	mutex_unlock(&reflck_lock);
-}
-
-static void vfio_pci_reflck_put(struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck)
-{
-	kref_put_mutex(&reflck->kref, vfio_pci_reflck_release, &reflck_lock);
-}
-
 static int vfio_pci_get_unused_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
 {
 	struct vfio_devices *devs = data;
@@ -2254,7 +2166,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_unused_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
 	vdev = container_of(device, struct vfio_pci_device, vdev);
 
 	/* Fault if the device is not unused */
-	if (vdev->refcnt) {
+	if (device->open_count) {
 		vfio_device_put(device);
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
@@ -2303,7 +2215,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_try_zap_and_vma_lock_cb(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data)
  *  - At least one of the affected devices is marked dirty via
  *    needs_reset (such as by lack of FLR support)
  * Then attempt to perform that bus or slot reset.  Callers are required
- * to hold vdev->reflck->lock, protecting the bus/slot reset group from
+ * to hold vdev->dev_set->lock, protecting the bus/slot reset group from
  * concurrent opens.  A vfio_device reference is acquired for each device
  * to prevent unbinds during the reset operation.
  *
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
index bbc56c857ef081..70414b6c904d89 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
+++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
@@ -83,11 +83,6 @@ struct vfio_pci_dummy_resource {
 	struct list_head	res_next;
 };
 
-struct vfio_pci_reflck {
-	struct kref		kref;
-	struct mutex		lock;
-};
-
 struct vfio_pci_vf_token {
 	struct mutex		lock;
 	uuid_t			uuid;
@@ -130,8 +125,6 @@ struct vfio_pci_device {
 	bool			needs_pm_restore;
 	struct pci_saved_state	*pci_saved_state;
 	struct pci_saved_state	*pm_save;
-	struct vfio_pci_reflck	*reflck;
-	int			refcnt;
 	int			ioeventfds_nr;
 	struct eventfd_ctx	*err_trigger;
 	struct eventfd_ctx	*req_trigger;
-- 
2.32.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-29  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-29  0:49 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 00/14] Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/14] vfio/samples: Remove module get/put Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 02/14] vfio/mbochs: Fix missing error unwind of mbochs_used_mbytes Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  7:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 03/14] vfio: Introduce a vfio_uninit_group_dev() API call Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 04/14] vfio: Provide better generic support for open/release vfio_device_ops Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  7:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 05/14] vfio/samples: Delete useless open/close Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/14] vfio/fsl: Move to the device set infrastructure Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 07/14] vfio/platform: Use open_device() instead of open coding a refcnt scheme Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-05 12:37   ` Eric Auger
2021-07-29  0:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 09/14] vfio/pci: Change vfio_pci_try_bus_reset() to use the dev_set Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  7:30   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-08-03 16:34   ` Alex Williamson
2021-08-03 16:41     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-03 16:52       ` Alex Williamson
2021-08-05 11:47         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-08-05 17:33           ` Alex Williamson
2021-08-05 23:05             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 10/14] vfio/pci: Reorganize VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET to use the device set Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/14] vfio/mbochs: Fix close when multiple device FDs are open Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 12/14] vfio/ap, ccw: Fix open/close " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 13/14] vfio/gvt: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  0:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 14/14] vfio: Remove struct vfio_device_ops open/release Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-29  2:13 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev7) Patchwork
2021-07-29  2:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-29  8:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-08-05 14:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev8) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8-v3-6c9e19cc7d44+15613-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 08/14] vfio/pci: Move to the device set infrastructure' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).