From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/ringbuffer: embed pipe_control
	into struct ring_buffer
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:24:25 -0700
Message-ID: <8739l3jn12.fsf@pollan.anholt.net>
References: <1303937166-1756-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<1303937166-1756-4-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0997163076=="
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
In-Reply-To: <1303937166-1756-4-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

--===============0997163076==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:46:06 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> =
wrote:
> Pipecontrol is also required to implement gfdt flushing on gen6+.
> And if we ever switch to pipecontrol based cache management in the
> kernel, also required on gen4. I don't see the point in saving that
> little bit of storge.
>=20
> In the process make cleanup_pipe_control more robust and call it
> unconditionally.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Nice.  I thought about this when reviewing the first, then decided I
didn't care enough.   But if you've already cleaned it up, great!

these two are:

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk24pakACgkQHUdvYGzw6vfBIQCfdUgwxEee5lAPfhBT9MCuhlaq
4j4AnRxOAMEhVn44e/t2Jd3qH0Bv1pXM
=jEcr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--

--===============0997163076==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

--===============0997163076==--