From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: small semaphore fix Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:03:07 -0700 Message-ID: <87wrdsb0o4.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> References: <1314820042-6169-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0075812795==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1314820042-6169-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Ben Widawsky List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0075812795== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:47:22 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Assertion + unsigned helps catch potential issues. >=20 > From the docs it is hard to tell if the global GTT flag is actually > needed, but it shouldn't hurt. We're updating a register, not the GTT, so I don't see why the flag would be relevant. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5fyNsACgkQHUdvYGzw6vfxWACcDSdpeY4+0z9VKuziiTt9OClm FO4Anijyyk4opkz1N2E0fN8pK+Feu2z3 =9ZrR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============0075812795== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx --===============0075812795==--