messages from 2020-04-02 14:31:25 to 2020-04-03 17:25:49 UTC [more...]
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/13] drm/i915: Port sync for skl+
2020-04-03 17:25 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Fix port sync code to work with >2 pipes
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Do pipe updates after enables for everyone
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Move the port sync DP_TP_CTL stuff to the encoder hook
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915/selftests: Add request throughput measurement to perf
2020-04-03 17:23 UTC (13+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/gt: Yield the timeslice if caught waiting on a user semaphore
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/10] dma-buf: Prettify typecasts for dma-fence-chain
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] dma-buf: Exercise dma-fence-chain under selftests
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/10] dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/10] drm/syncobj: Allow use of dma-fence-proxy
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/gem: Teach execbuf how to wait on future syncobj
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gem: Allow combining submit-fences with syncobj
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915/selftests: Add request throughput measurement to perf
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/23] perf/core: Only copy-to-user after completely unlocking all locks, v2
2020-04-03 17:16 UTC (16+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/23] Revert "drm/i915/gem: Split eb_vma into its own allocation"
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/23] drm/i915: Nuke arguments to eb_pin_engine
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/23] drm/i915: Rework intel_context pinning to do everything outside of pin_mutex
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/23] drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/23] drm/i915: Convert i915_perf to ww locking as well
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/23] drm/i915: Dirty hack to fix selftests locking inversion
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/23] drm/i915/selftests: Fix locking inversion in lrc selftest
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/23] drm/i915: Use ww pinning for intel_context_create_request()
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/23] drm/i915: Move i915_vma_lock in the selftests to avoid lock inversion, v2
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to vm_fault_gtt
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/23] drm/i915: Add ww locking to pin_to_display_plane
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/23] drm/i915: Ensure we hold the pin mutex
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/23] perf/core: Only copy-to-user after completely unlocking all locks, v2
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 00/10] SAGV support for Gen12+
2020-04-03 17:05 UTC (28+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 02/10] drm/i915: Eliminate magic numbers "0" and "1" from color plane
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 04/10] drm/i915: Add intel_atomic_get_bw_*_state helpers
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 05/10] drm/i915: Extract gen specific functions from intel_can_enable_sagv
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 07/10] drm/i915: Added required new PCode commands
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 08/10] drm/i915: Rename bw_state to new_bw_state
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev4)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev5)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev10)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev12)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev10)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev13)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/3] i915 lpsp support for lpsp igt
2020-04-03 17:02 UTC (12+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915: Add i915_lpsp_info debugfs
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for i915 lpsp support for lpsp igt (rev6)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Revoke mmap before fence
2020-04-03 17:01 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 1/5] uaccess: Add user_read_access_begin/end and user_write_access_begin/end
2020-04-03 16:59 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/5] uaccess: Selectively open read or write user access
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915/gem: Replace user_access_begin by user_write_access_begin
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] powerpc/uaccess: Implement user_read_access_begin and user_write_access_begin
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 5/5] uaccess: Rename user_access_begin/end() to user_full_access_begin/end()
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [v2,1/5] uaccess: Add user_read_access_begin/end and user_write_access_begin/end
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Avoid setting timer->expires to 0
2020-04-03 16:57 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 09/10] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth
2020-04-03 16:41 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/perf: Do not clear pollin for small user read buffers
2020-04-03 16:17 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/perf: Do not clear pollin for small user read buffers (rev7)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v20 06/10] drm/i915: Add proper SAGV support for TGL+
2020-04-03 15:43 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v21 "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/44] devm_drm_dev_alloc, no more drmm_add_final_kfree
2020-04-03 15:33 UTC (53+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/44] drivers/base: Always release devres on device_del
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/44] drm: Add devm_drm_dev_alloc macro
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/44] drm/device: Deprecate dev_private harder
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/44] drm/vgem: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/44] drm/vkms: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/44] drm/vboxvideo: drop DRM_MTRR_WC #define
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/44] drm/vboxvideo: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/44] drm/vboxvideo: Stop using drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/44] drm/vboxvidoe: use managed pci functions
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/44] drm/vboxvideo: Use devm_gen_pool_create
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/44] drm/v3d: Don't set drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/44] drm/v3d: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/44] drm/v3d: Delete v3d_dev->dev
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/44] drm/v3d: Delete v3d_dev->pdev
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/44] drm/udl: Use demv_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/44] drm/udl: don't set drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/44] drm/st7735r: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 18/44] drm/st7586: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 19/44] drm/repaper: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 20/44] drm/mi0283qt: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 21/44] drm/ili9486: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 22/44] drm/ili9341: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/44] drm/ili9225: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 24/44] drm/hx8357d: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 25/44] drm/gm12u320: "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 26/44] drm/gm12u320: Don't use drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/44] drm/tidss: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 28/44] drm/tidss: Don't use drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 29/44] drm/tidss: Delete tidss->saved_state
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 30/44] drm/qxl: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/44] drm/qxl: Don't use drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/44] drm/mcde: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 33/44] drm/mcde: Don't use drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 34/44] drm/ingenic: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 35/44] drm/ingenic: Don't set drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 36/44] drm/komeda: use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 37/44] drm/armada: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 38/44] drm/armada: Don't use drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 39/44] drm/cirrus: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 40/44] drm/cirrus: Don't use drm_device->dev_private
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 41/44] drm/i915: Use devm_drm_dev_alloc
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 42/44] drm/i915/selftest: Create mock_destroy_device
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 43/44] drm/i915/selftests: align more to real device lifetimes
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 44/44] drm/managed: Cleanup of unused functions and polishing docs
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for devm_drm_dev_alloc, no more drmm_add_final_kfree
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Keep a per-engine request pools
2020-04-03 14:17 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Keep a per-engine request pools (rev2)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] gitlab.fd.o financial situation and impact on services
2020-04-03 14:12 UTC (13+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [Mesa-dev] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/gt: move remaining debugfs interfaces into gt
2020-04-03 14:09 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gt: move remaining debugfs interfaces into gt (rev3)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Use per-engine request pools
2020-04-03 13:54 UTC (9+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Use per-engine request pools (rev5)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Use per-engine request pools (rev7)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Use per-engine request pools (rev8)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] lib: Bump estimates for object overhead
2020-04-03 13:24 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] perf/core: Only copy-to-user after completely unlocking all locks, v2
2020-04-03 13:10 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 00/12] Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability
2020-04-03 13:08 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 04/12] perf tool: extend Perf tool with CAP_PERFMON capability support
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Introduce CAP_PERFMON to secure system performance monitoring and observability (rev5)
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Check current i915_vma.pin_count status first on unbind
2020-04-03 13:05 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Check current i915_vma.pin_count status first on unbind (rev6)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: Utilize rcu iteration of context engines
2020-04-03 13:02 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Utilize rcu iteration of context engines (rev3)
[Intel-gfx] 5.6-rc6: Xorg hangs
2020-04-03 13:00 UTC (10+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] 5.6-rc7: Xorg hangs, too
` [Intel-gfx] 5.7-rc0: hangs while attempting to run X
` [Intel-gfx] 5.7-rc0: regression caused by drm tree, "
` [Intel-gfx] [bisected] "
` [Intel-gfx] [bisected] Re: 7dc8f11437: regression in 5.7-rc0, "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/17] drm/i915/audio: use struct drm_device based logging
2020-04-03 12:11 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [01/17] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] lib: Fix device lists not cleaned up sufficiently before rescan
2020-04-03 11:47 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Check current i915_vma.pin_count status first on unbind
2020-04-03 11:27 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Check current i915_vma.pin_count status first on unbind (rev4)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Check current i915_vma.pin_count status first on unbind (rev5)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove WARN_ON and WARN_ON_ONCE overrides
2020-04-03 10:34 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for "
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/gem: Drop cached obj->bind_count
2020-04-03 10:00 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Drop cached obj->bind_count (rev3)
[Intel-gfx] [CI 1/3] drm/i915/gt: Only wait for GPU activity before unbinding a GGTT fence
2020-04-03 9:37 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [CI,1/3] "
[Intel-gfx] kernel 5.6: baytrail hdmi audio not working
2020-04-03 9:18 UTC (4+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/gem: Try allocating va from free space
2020-04-03 9:09 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/gem: Try allocating va from free space (rev3)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm: report dp downstream port type as a subconnector property
2020-04-03 7:01 UTC (3+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PULL] gvt-next-fixes
2020-04-03 3:05 UTC (3+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/display: Move out code to return the digital_port of the aux ch
2020-04-03 1:18 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/tc/icl: Implement TC cold sequences
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/tgl: Make Wa_14010229206 permanent
2020-04-02 22:49 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915/selftests: Check for has-reset before testing hostile contexts
2020-04-02 22:02 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/selftests: Check for has-reset before testing hostile contexts (rev2)
[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes
2020-04-02 21:30 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/execlists: Peek at the next submission for error interrupts
2020-04-02 20:30 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/execlists: Record the active CCID from before reset
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Cleanup kerneldoc warnings
2020-04-02 18:53 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/perf_pmu: Exercise mixing perf reads into i915 mmaps
2020-04-02 16:10 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] "
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).