messages from 2020-05-07 08:22:09 to 2020-05-11 05:09:48 UTC [more...]
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mst: filter out the display mode exceed sink's capability
2020-05-11 5:09 UTC (5+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Mark the GGTT as closed upon driver removal
2020-05-10 16:00 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Emit await(batch) before MI_BB_START
2020-05-10 13:53 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/selftests: Always flush before unpining after writing
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/gt: Restore Cherryview back to full-ppgtt
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Emit await(batch) before MI_BB_START
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH hmm v2 1/5] mm/hmm: make CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE into a select
2020-05-10 0:16 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Watch out for idling during i915_gem_evict_something
2020-05-09 15:00 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [CI] drm/i915: Replace the hardcoded I915_FENCE_TIMEOUT
2020-05-09 14:50 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Couple up old virtual breadcrumb on new sibling
2020-05-09 14:43 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Mark up the racy read of execlists->context_tag
2020-05-09 13:49 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency
2020-05-09 10:46 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: Replace the hardcoded I915_FENCE_TIMEOUT
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Fix page flip ioctl format check
2020-05-09 10:13 UTC (7+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Peel dma-fence-chains for await
2020-05-08 20:36 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Peel dma-fence-chains for await (rev3)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
2020-05-08 18:49 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/59] devm_drm_dev_alloc, v2
2020-05-08 18:07 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 53/59] drm/arc: Move to drm/tiny
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] tests/gem_exec_nop: Remove submission batching
2020-05-08 17:54 UTC (5+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/gem_exec_nop: Kill obsolete pass/fail metric
` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/gem_exec_nop: Remove submission batching
` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/9] drm/i915: Ignore submit-fences on the same timeline
2020-05-08 15:58 UTC (25+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915: Pull waiting on an external dma-fence into its routine
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/9] drm/i915: Prevent using semaphores to chain up to external fences
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915: Tidy awaiting on dma-fences
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/syncobj: Allow use of dma-fence-proxy
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 7/9] drm/i915/gem: Teach execbuf how to wait on future syncobj
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 8/9] drm/i915/gem: Allow combining submit-fences with syncobj
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 9/9] drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Ignore submit-fences on the same timeline
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] dma-buf: Use atomic_fetch_add() for the context id
2020-05-08 14:46 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gt: Improve precision on defer_request assert
2020-05-08 14:03 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[PATCH 1/3] drm/atomic: Take the atomic toys away from X
2020-05-08 12:24 UTC (6+ messages)
` [PATCH] "
` [Intel-gfx] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/dsb: Pre allocate and late cleanup of cmd buffer
2020-05-08 11:14 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/22] Introduce Rocket Lake
2020-05-08 9:44 UTC (20+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/22] drm/i915/rkl: Add RKL platform info and PCI ids
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/22] drm/i915/rkl: Update memory bandwidth parameters
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/22] drm/i915/rkl: Limit number of universal planes to 5
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/22] drm/i915/rkl: RKL only uses PHY_MISC for PHY's A and B
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/22] drm/i915/rkl: Check proper SDEISR bits for TC1 and TC2 outputs
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/22] drm/i915/rkl: provide port/phy mapping for vbt
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 17/22] drm/i915/rkl: Don't try to read out DSI transcoders
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Ignore submit-fences on the same timeline
2020-05-08 9:10 UTC (14+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Pull waiting on an external dma-fence into its routine
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915: Prevent using semaphores to chain up to external fences
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: Tidy awaiting on dma-fences
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] dma-buf: Proxy fence, an unsignaled fence placeholder
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/syncobj: Allow use of dma-fence-proxy
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/gem: Teach execbuf how to wait on future syncobj
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/gem: Allow combining submit-fences with syncobj
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/gt: Declare when we enabled timeslicing
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: Drop no-semaphore boosting
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: Move saturated workload detection back to the context
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Ignore submit-fences on the same timeline
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/9] Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN*
2020-05-08 7:23 UTC (4+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/9] drm/i915/display/sdvo: "
[Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
2020-05-08 7:04 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] RFC: i915: Drop relocation support on Gen12+
2020-05-08 5:58 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for "
[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes
2020-05-08 5:24 UTC
[Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree
2020-05-08 3:50 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 00/14] In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs
2020-05-08 2:20 UTC (19+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 01/14] video/hdmi: Add Unpack only function for DRM infoframe
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 02/14] drm/i915/dp: Read out DP SDPs
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 03/14] drm: Add logging function for DP VSC SDP
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 04/14] drm/i915: Include HDMI DRM infoframe in the crtc state dump
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 05/14] drm/i915: Include DP HDR Metadata Infoframe SDP "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 06/14] drm/i915: Include DP VSC "
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 07/14] drm/i915: Program DP SDPs with computed configs
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 08/14] drm/i915: Add state readout for DP HDR Metadata Infoframe SDP
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 09/14] drm/i915: Add state readout for DP VSC SDP
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 10/14] drm/i915: Fix enabled infoframe states of lspcon
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 11/14] drm/i915: Program DP SDPs on pipe updates
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 12/14] drm/i915: Stop sending DP SDPs on ddi disable
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Add compute routine for DP PSR VSC SDP
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v11 14/14] drm/i915/psr: Use new DP VSC SDP compute routine on PSR
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for In order to readout DP SDPs, refactors the handling of DP SDPs (rev13)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] Revert "drm/i915/tgl: Include ro parts of l3 to invalidate"
2020-05-07 22:28 UTC (6+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gen12: Invalidate aux table entries forcibly
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gen12: Add aux table invalidate for all engines
2020-05-07 21:32 UTC (8+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen12: Add aux table invalidate for all engines (rev2)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency
2020-05-07 21:24 UTC (10+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Treat weak-dependencies as bidirectional when applying priorities
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Remove wait priority boosting
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [v2] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency (rev2)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency (rev3)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v28 0/6] SAGV support for Gen12+
2020-05-07 20:39 UTC (10+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v28 1/6] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v28 2/6] drm/i915: Extract skl SAGV checking
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v28 3/6] drm/i915: Make active_pipes check skl specific
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v28 4/6] drm/i915: Add TGL+ SAGV support
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v28 5/6] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v28 6/6] drm/i915: Enable SAGV support for Gen12
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for SAGV support for Gen12+ (rev36)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/mst: Wait for ACT sent before enabling the pipe
2020-05-07 19:00 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency
2020-05-07 18:05 UTC (17+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/gem: Treat submit-fence as weak dependency for new clients
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Treat weak-dependencies as bidirectional when applying priorities
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency (rev2)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-fixes
2020-05-07 16:01 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 3/4] drm/i915/perf: prepare driver to receive multiple ctx handles
2020-05-07 14:42 UTC (2+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [kbuild] "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915: Turn intel_digital_port_connected() in a vfunc
2020-05-07 14:14 UTC (10+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/3] drm/i915: Stash hpd status bits under dev_priv
` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 "
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Hotplug cleanups (rev7)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: "
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency
2020-05-07 11:06 UTC (3+ messages)
` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency (rev2)
` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure "
[Intel-gfx] [drm-tip:drm-tip 3/9] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c:1428:31: error: 'struct intel_context' has no member named 'lrc_desc'
2020-05-07 11:03 UTC
[Intel-gfx] [bug report] drm/i915: Use the async worker to avoid reclaim tainting the ggtt->mutex
2020-05-07 9:22 UTC (2+ messages)
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/display: Warn if the FBC is still writing to stolen on removal
2020-05-07 8:58 UTC (3+ messages)
page: next (older) | prev (newer) | latest
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).