From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B419C433EF for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4764261100 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:59:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 4764261100 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00066E194; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 11:59:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 355 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at gabe; Wed, 08 Sep 2021 03:23:01 UTC Received: from condef-05.nifty.com (condef-05.nifty.com [202.248.20.70]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E776E0F7 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 03:23:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from conssluserg-05.nifty.com ([10.126.8.84])by condef-05.nifty.com with ESMTP id 1883EZ58020190; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:14:36 +0900 Received: from mail-pg1-f173.google.com (mail-pg1-f173.google.com [209.85.215.173]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-05.nifty.com with ESMTP id 1883Dv7r024261; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:13:58 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-05.nifty.com 1883Dv7r024261 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1631070838; bh=DiTP/AS3T3vq4JaeKSJu2Ri/qt3KnM6Fx/+72YJ6xGU=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=uq24T7VOY9DzMY2Ttse8IMfSKSJ3nAzJEww51VcTiGop5IKF9mXMZoEJE8g+oB25J H8FXrW273mevkmofLJZdPfyWYc7pVppc52cATl3m3HQR+Gbp2A46519A8xON0MtMat WCZdIstesFb5Hc212QXqESmLXSp6bZ7HLWJy3VCA3v952l+bZD02aJFWB2W9en3ZVY EGhJzWA9IbCxNqGyycrcBGMJs6uKzPeKuM5EZ9KjI3hYnltsimRBj7f5uwhX2jTHbi tEJIOmIrTqFFHa5TDe+OF8CU7Ty9FDvzDKanrRSMdxfajodpXa150TF0+tG+22ez/a DPe2n7cd1ZXRQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.215.173] Received: by mail-pg1-f173.google.com with SMTP id w7so1021036pgk.13; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 20:13:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532yhB3hzh26rhPaZtX7vUeAJEm2OjA8J3K1vBvXKHGSSKROIXte J+iXo16dsSOV9C8S/BwhUP6/Es7IMoebIJlZ1k0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPU4uh1o2NcT/aR4ZPGLpv6t2vzuzFEOmM8q5aihG3cwIUJLm6ZYqb445avfVEnp26Ym0k8VmPnUWDt0gqMjM= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:949d:0:b0:416:4555:3021 with SMTP id z29-20020aa7949d000000b0041645553021mr1560140pfk.36.1631070837441; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 20:13:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210820123348.6535a87e@canb.auug.org.au> <20210902075038.7461d3c8@canb.auug.org.au> <20210906084947.4f65761d@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:13:20 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Stephen Rothwell , intel-gfx , Joonas Lahtinen , "Nikula, Jani" , Rodrigo Vivi , Dave Airlie , DRI , John Harrison , Matthew Brost , Alexey Dobriyan , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 11:59:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 4:34 PM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 12:49 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > On Thu, 2 Sep 2021 07:50:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 15:23:34 +0900 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:33 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > > After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > > > > > failed like this: > > > > > > > > > > In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:39: > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h:9:10: fatal error: stddef.h: No such file or directory > > > > > 9 | #include > > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > > > Caused by commit > > > > > > > > > > 564f963eabd1 ("isystem: delete global -isystem compile option") > > > > > > > > > > from the kbuild tree interacting with commit > > > > > > > > > > b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to work with GuC") > > > > > > > > > > I have applied the following patch for today. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > This fix-up does not depend on my kbuild tree in any way. > > > > > > > > So, the drm maintainer can apply it to his tree. > > > > > > > > Perhaps with > > > > > > > > Fixes: b97060a99b01 ("drm/i915/guc: Update intel_gt_wait_for_idle to > > > > work with GuC") > > > > > > OK, so that didn't happen so I will now apply the merge fix up to the > > > merge of the kbuild tree. > > > > > > > > From: Stephen Rothwell > > > > > Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 12:24:19 +1000 > > > > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: use linux/stddef.h due to "isystem: trim/fixup stdarg.h and other headers" > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h > > > > > index 51dbe0e3294e..d2969f68dd64 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_requests.h > > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > > > > > #ifndef INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H > > > > > #define INTEL_GT_REQUESTS_H > > > > > > > > > > -#include > > > > > +#include > > > > > > > > > > struct intel_engine_cs; > > > > > struct intel_gt; > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.32.0 > > > > Ping? I am still applying this ... > > Apologies, this fell through a lot of cracks. I applied this to drm-next now. Rather, I was planning to apply this fix to my kbuild tree. Since you guys did not fix the issue in time, I ended up with dropping [1] from my pull request. I want to get [1] merged in this MW. If I postponed it, somebody would add new or inclusion in the next development cycle, I will never make it in the mainline. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/YQhY40teUJcTc5H4@localhost.localdomain/ > Matt/John, as author/committer it's your job to make sure issues and > fixes for the stuff you're pushing don't get lost. I'd have expected > John to apply this to at least drm-intel-gt-next (it's not even > there). > > Joonas, I think this is the 2nd or 3rd or so issue this release cycle > where some compile fix got stuck a bit because drm-intel-gt-next isn't > in linux-next. Can we please fix that? It probably needs some changes > to the dim script. > > Cheers, Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada