Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/gem: Correct the locking and pin pattern for dma-buf (v6)

[Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>]

On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 4:07 AM Matthew Auld
<matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 at 15:14, Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net> wrote:
> >
> > From: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > If our exported dma-bufs are imported by another instance of our driver,
> > that instance will typically have the imported dma-bufs locked during
> > dma_buf_map_attachment(). But the exporter also locks the same reservation
> > object in the map_dma_buf() callback, which leads to recursive locking.
> >
> > So taking the lock inside _pin_pages_unlocked() is incorrect.
> >
> > Additionally, the current pinning code path is contrary to the defined
> > way that pinning should occur.
> >
> > Remove the explicit pin/unpin from the map/umap functions and move them
> > to the attach/detach allowing correct locking to occur, and to match
> > the static dma-buf drm_prime pattern.
> >
> > Add a live selftest to exercise both dynamic and non-dynamic
> > exports.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Extend the selftest with a fake dynamic importer.
> > - Provide real pin and unpin callbacks to not abuse the interface.
> > v3: (ruhl)
> > - Remove the dynamic export support and move the pinning into the
> >   attach/detach path.
> > v4: (ruhl)
> > - Put pages does not need to assert on the dma-resv
> > v5: (jason)
> > - Lock around dma_buf_unmap_attachment() when emulating a dynamic
> >   importer in the subtests.
> > - Use pin_pages_unlocked
> > v6: (jason)
> > - Use dma_buf_attach instead of dma_buf_attach_dynamic in the selftests
> >
> > Reported-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |  43 ++++++--
> >  .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  | 103 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> > index 616c3a2f1baf0..9a655f69a0671 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> >  #include "i915_gem_object.h"
> >  #include "i915_scatterlist.h"
> >
> > +I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static bool force_different_devices;)
> > +
> >  static struct drm_i915_gem_object *dma_buf_to_obj(struct dma_buf *buf)
> >  {
> >         return to_intel_bo(buf->priv);
> > @@ -25,15 +27,11 @@ static struct sg_table *i915_gem_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachme
> >         struct scatterlist *src, *dst;
> >         int ret, i;
> >
> > -       ret = i915_gem_object_pin_pages_unlocked(obj);
> > -       if (ret)
> > -               goto err;
> > -
> >         /* Copy sg so that we make an independent mapping */
> >         st = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sg_table), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         if (st == NULL) {
> >                 ret = -ENOMEM;
> > -               goto err_unpin_pages;
> > +               goto err;
> >         }
> >
> >         ret = sg_alloc_table(st, obj->mm.pages->nents, GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -58,8 +56,6 @@ static struct sg_table *i915_gem_map_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachme
> >         sg_free_table(st);
> >  err_free:
> >         kfree(st);
> > -err_unpin_pages:
> > -       i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
> >  err:
> >         return ERR_PTR(ret);
> >  }
> > @@ -68,13 +64,9 @@ static void i915_gem_unmap_dma_buf(struct dma_buf_attachment *attachment,
> >                                    struct sg_table *sg,
> >                                    enum dma_data_direction dir)
> >  {
> > -       struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(attachment->dmabuf);
> > -
> >         dma_unmap_sgtable(attachment->dev, sg, dir, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
> >         sg_free_table(sg);
> >         kfree(sg);
> > -
> > -       i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int i915_gem_dmabuf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, struct dma_buf_map *map)
> > @@ -168,7 +160,31 @@ static int i915_gem_end_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dma_buf, enum dma_data_direct
> >         return err;
> >  }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * i915_gem_dmabuf_attach - Do any extra attach work necessary
> > + * @dmabuf: imported dma-buf
> > + * @attach: new attach to do work on
> > + *
> > + */
> > +static int i915_gem_dmabuf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > +                                 struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
> > +{
> > +       struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(dmabuf);
> > +
> > +       return i915_gem_object_pin_pages_unlocked(obj);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void i915_gem_dmabuf_detach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> > +                                  struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
> > +{
> > +       struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = dma_buf_to_obj(dmabuf);
> > +
> > +       i915_gem_object_unpin_pages(obj);
> > +}
> > +
>
> We don't normally add kernel-doc for static functions? Otherwise
> dmabuf_detach() needs matching kernel-doc.

Dropped.

> <snip>
>
> > +
> > +static int igt_dmabuf_import_same_driver(void *arg)
> > +{
> > +       struct drm_i915_private *i915 = arg;
> > +       struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, *import_obj;
> > +       struct drm_gem_object *import;
> > +       struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
> > +       struct dma_buf_attachment *import_attach;
> > +       struct sg_table *st;
> > +       long timeout;
> > +       int err;
> > +
> > +       force_different_devices = true;
> > +       obj = i915_gem_object_create_shmem(i915, PAGE_SIZE);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(obj))
>
> err = PTR_ERR(obj)

Done.

> <snip>
>
> > +       /* Now try a fake an importer */
> > +       import_attach = dma_buf_attach(dmabuf, obj->base.dev->dev);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(import_attach))
> > +               goto out_import;
> > +
> > +       st = dma_buf_map_attachment(import_attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > +       if (IS_ERR(st))
> > +               goto out_detach;
>
> For these two maybe missing err = ?

Yup.  Fixed.  I also changed the (int)PTR_ERR() in the error prints
like you asked for in the next patch.

--Jason
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx